"My community, my rules" --- NOT!

I can’t believe I have to say this again. I said it once before, in my old MySpace blog, when I saw a billboard with a picture of a woman, that said, “My neighborhood, my rules.” **

This time, the billboard showed two women, and it said, “Our Community, Our Rules.” Ha ha, someone must have read my old blog! Nice try, but it still doesn’t fly.

The possessive pronoun “my” can be used in two ways: one way denotes something you have personal possession of (“my underwear,” “my bank account”) or that is part of your body or yourself. (“my spleen,” “my mind,” “my personal standards of behavior.”)

The other way denotes things that you have a relationship with, or that you belong to: my age group, my religion, my spouse, my school, my employer.

You can certainly impose your rules on your personal possessions and your body. You can even try imposing your rules on your spouse – ha ha, good luck. But “my community” is definitely in the second category; and changing “my” to “our” may make the distinction a little more fuzzy, but it doesn’t really change it. Not with a picture of only two people. The only time this ever happens is if you live in one of those “gated communities” or maybe in condos, where sometimes two people do indeed effectively make all the rules.

But out here in the big scary real world, I’m afraid that just doesn’t apply. The first obligation of every block, neighborhood, and community is to the actual law. And the law is very clear that, unless someone is provably breaking the law, they have a right to be there – even if you don’t like it!

Show me a billboard with a few hundred people that says, “Our community, our rules,” and it wouldn’t piss me off so bad, but it would still be wrong. Say a few dozen of you don’t like that guy whose kids are thugs, or who has a grossly untidy yard. You can go over there and ring the doorbell and tell them about it, but you still cannot make the rules.

I think this whole mindset of people who think that their standards or personal dislikes are somehow more important than others’, and that it is okay to attempt to force their standards on other people in their own homes, is dangerous and repugnant. (This is why there are no live blues clubs left in Oakland. In at least one case I know of personally, ONE GUY moved in, knowing the club was there, the club’s hours and so forth; then sued the place and SHUT THEM DOWN. The club had been there for 30 years, and when I lived next door myself for years I never heard anyone else ever complain about it. It really wasn’t particularly loud, and closed down at midnight.)

I really do understand what these billboards are trying to accomplish, but they’re going about it in the wrong way.
**Here is the original blog, if you’re interested:

"I have seen the following phrase around a lot lately, especially on billboards:
“My neighborhood. My rules.”
I think what we have here is a semantic problem. Being the good grammarian that I am, I want to try and explain it to these people.

You see, the possessive pronoun (“my” and “your”, in this case) can be used in two ways – to denote something which belongs to you, and to denote something you belong to. The expression “my neighborhood” is not meant in the first sense. You do not own it.

“My socks, my rules.” Sure. “My house, my rules.” Okay, although that one just kind of rankles, you know? “My backyard, my rules.” Certainly.

Your neighborhood is something you belong to. Can you see The Who singing, “My Generation, My Rules”? Can you imagine walking up to your kindergarten teacher and saying, “My teacher, my rules”? How about, "My demographic, my rules"? "My job, my rules"? It just doesn’t work that way.

So, it may be your neighborhood – but no, it’s NOT your rules. OTHER people live there too, and I suspect they probably each have their own idea of what the rules should be. You have to TALK TO them in order to decide on any rules; what’s more, everyone’s opinion has the same value as yours, even if you don’t like it.

You know that house down the street with “a lot of traffic”? Turns out it’s some folks with a large extended family, and the mother is active in her church group which has meetings at her house. The daughter excels in math and tutors several of her fellow students, who of course come and go.

Those kids hanging out on the corner? What exactly are they doing that you think is bad? Yes, they’re rude and derisive, but if that were a crime, our President (Note: it was Bush at the time I wrote this) would be a Habitual Offender.

Those people who have activity “at all hours”? You better hope one of them isn’t a night nurse at the hospital if you ever are injured, or the baker who bakes the sweet rolls you need promptly at seven for a business meeting, or the guy who’s flying the plane on your next redeye flight to the home office.

Your neighborhood is someplace you belong to. Maybe you should try acting like it.

This looks much more like a rant than a debate.

Would you like me to move it to The BBQ Pit for you?
(Otherwise, I can simply close it. If there is a debate in there, somewhere, post it succinctly.)

[ /Moderating ]

Off to The BBQ Pit per OP request.

What were the rules they were trying to promote, anyway?

I mean, was it an etiquette thing? “No leafblowers before 10:00 a.m. on Saturday?”

Or religious rules? “Nobody is allowed to do yardwork on the Sabbath?”

Or…what? I mean, it could have been an anti-litter campaign, and I’d be sympathetic. “Our neighborhood: don’t throw your trash in the gutter.”

At very least, they should make their actual agenda clear!

Well, they’ve expanded into other important areas. Literacy programs. Preserving their beloved covered bridges. World domination.

I believe the only other text was “support positive changes,” a phrase so vague as to be almost useless. I mean, there was probably some “www dot something” at the very bottom in teeny letters but you know, I’d’a had to pull my bike over in rush hour traffic to read it.

You guys are right, though – that raises a good point: unless you happen to be looking out the window of an office building across the street, or stopped at a traffic light, who the hell is going to have time to figure out what the message is?

Those are stupid billboards. No, it is not “Your community, your rules;” it is, “Your community has the same rules as the rest of the city you live in. You don’t get to pick and choose from those.”

Unless your community has a covanent, in which case the association creates rules in a democratic process. About what color you can paint your house and how long a car can be parked in a driveway. In theory it’s a democratic process. Most people I know who have them say they are actually dictatorships of busybodies.

My Goodness My Guinness!

I can definitely get behind two of those.

What have you got against bridges?

I don’t understand the context here. What are the billboards for? What rules are they talking about?

I’d like to get on board with this rant, but it’s tough to do so if we can’t figure out what we’re ranting about…

Nothing - but covers? Not on my watch sir. What are they hiding?

Is this the billboard?

From their website, it looks like it’s for a campaign for healthier eating and exercise habits. I don’t really understand their slogans, but the program looks pretty harmless.

Unless you’re stuck with an HOA, who will impose a billion other stupid arbitrary rules above and beyond the city’s bylaws. But that’s a whole other rant.

Healthy eating and exercise? Fuck that socialist bullshit! GET YOUR HEALTH CONCERNS OFF MY BODY!

Them bitches be judging’ me, man…

The best I can figure, maybe they’re intending to say something like,

“People have a tendency to think ‘community’ is their environment, something they swim in. Bullshit. Community is something you make. And I’m taking part in making community according to principles I believe in, rules that I follow that I think will help make this community better. In my community, here are my rules…”

I think they’re saying that in a really sloppy and obscure fashion, but I think that’s what they’re trying to get at.

Hopefully. Because the first thing the slogan brings to mind is those ultra-orthodox nutjobs in Israel.

C3: *Mon Dieu! * Yes, it is!! Well now that is just hella confusing. I mean, wouldn’t you think that that falls under the “my HOUSE, my rules” heading? WTH does your community have to do with healthier eating habits? (I mean in a way that isn’t a real stretch?) And WTH kind of rules could two people realistically impose on their community that would “stand up for healthy changes?”

Make no mistake – I am so down for healthy eating, within the context of me being an irrepressible foodie. (i.e., not only eat healthy, but eat healthy things from every remote corner of the world, but only if they are delicious! And Zinfandel goes remarkably well with everything!)

Left Hand of Dorkness, that’s a really good translation, I can almost grasp the reasoning. Sort of. But, as Grumman says, it really doesn’t come off that way.

Maybe it’s sorta like, “Just because others in my community have or are perceived to have unhealthy eating habits, it doesn’t mean I have to go along with it.”

Well crap. Now I can’t be pissed anymore. [emily latella] Never mind! [/emily latella]