My Review of the First Episode of Breaking Bad (Long)

In this thread I was challenged to watch the first episode of the television show Breaking Bad. This was issued to me in response to my assertion in the thread that contemporary television, excuse me, blows chunks.

I have watched said program, and will now attempt to offer a fair assessment:

(Please note: After spending more than an hour on my first review, it was lost in the ether just before I posted. I am trying to resurrect what I said word for word without my obvious frustration at this event becoming too apparent.)

First the good things about the program:

The show uses ordinary looking people. Well, ordinary by Hollywood standards anyway. It’s a step in the right direction from the usual Barbie and Ken doll casts of today’s offerings.

The dialog is believeable and flows naturally.

The premise is interesting, if somewhat flawed. I say it’s flawed because I find it difficult to believe that the main character after apparently being such a straight arrow for so many years, (he’s a Nobel Prize recipient, or nominee, for heaven’s sake) would immediately turn to a life of crime upon being told that he has terminal cancer. Now, this is not an automatic dismissal, if one brings suspension of disbelief into play. After all, Hogan’s Heroes had a totally ridiculous concept, and yet was quite an enjoyable show. From what I’ve read, Breaking Bad is considered to have some claim to being a dark comedy, so we must keep an open mind about premises.

Now, the bad things, in my opinion:

The characters. The main character, Walter, is a man so emotionally stunted that he manages to keep the news of his terminal cancer completely to himself. He tells no one about it, not his wife, his son, his friends, relatives, coworkers, nobody. This sort of detachment makes a character difficult to identify or sympathize with. Walter spends long stretches staring into space, unable even to work up enthusiasm for a handjob from his wife.

Admittedly, no one would want a handjob from his wife, a cardboard cutout, casting call, ice bitch of a spouse. Walter’s son, named Walter Jr of all things,
is physically disabled, but otherwise little used. There is a scene where Walter Sr comes to the rescue of his son by bullying his son’s bullies, but the scene is played so emotionally flat that there’s a real “so what?” quality to it. The entire scene is immediately forgotten anyway, and the ice bitch who witnessed it, remarks later to her sister that her husband has gotten “so quiet” lately.

Walter’s bigoted brother-in-law is more interesting, but only because he’s loud and bigoted. Anyway, he’s not used much here. Walter’s partner in crime Jesse is a non-entity, a sulking, slacking, gang-banger type. The bad guys are typical bad guys.

As for the story, you can nitpick on questions about why a Nobel Prize recipient or nominee is washing cars when he has a job teaching high school, or if his financial situation is so bad, why does he use his last $7000 to buy an RV simply on his incompetent partner’s say so. However, where I found the story to become really laughable is Walter’s actions after he kills the bad guys by concocting poison gas in the RV meth lab.

A casually discarded cigarette has started a small fire in the desert underbrush, and Walter is afraid the fumes of the meth lab in the RV will ignite. (Or so I surmise. The story becomes rather unclear here.) Walter has gas masks, and one appears immediately on his face. Obviously the thing to do is to get into the RV and drive it down the road a bit, out of harm’s way, correct?

But Walter, Mr Impreturbable until now, barrels down the desert in the RV like he’s filming a remake of Bullitt, bouncing around manically, shaking up all those volatile chemicals he’s hauling, until he finally runs off the road into the ditch. Why? Beats me. At least he was nice enough to put the other gas mask on his reluctant accomplice Jesse.

After recording a drippy speech to his family on his cellphone, Walter hears sirens in the distance. Thinking it’s the police, he makes an unsuccessful attempt at suicide. But the sirens turn out to be fire trucks, although how fire trucks were summoned so quickly in the middle of nowhere, and by whom is never explained.
Perhaps the fire department was watching Walter’s mad RV rampage from a helicopter, and were convinced that the brush fire he was escaping from must’ve rivaled Yellowstone in 1988 to produce such panic in such a emotionless man. It really was a pitiful little blaze though. They must’ve felt silly to bring three trucks to it.

The episode ends in some cliched nooky between Walter and his ice bitch wife. Well, you must justify that mature theme disclaimer somehow, you know.

As to whether I will feel compelled to continue watching this series, as I was dared not to in the above cited thread, I think I can restrain myself, thank you.

Sigh. I must continue my lonely quest to find television that doesn’t suck.

Well fine, the link in my OP doesn’t work. The thread in questionis this. It’s called “The New TV Season” if the link still doesn’t work. Which it freakin’ doesn’t apparently. :mad:

But Gunsmoke is solid tv? Oookay.

Yes. Why, yes it is.

Walter’s detachment is necessarily a major component of the series, as we follow his down-going spiral. He is an anti-hero. Sympathy might not be the first thing we should feel for him.

I agree that could have been handled more naturally, but as with many pilots there are some kinks here and there. The story-telling improves as the show goes.

The character Hank, the brother-in-law, goes through a lot of positive development as the show moves forward. There are some great scenes for this actor.

Correct about Jesse. And it is precisely why the two of them develop such a great dynamic. Jesse has soul and moral strife where Walt has none. This is another actor who achieves great things later on.

More than anything, I would say he is panicking because he is keeping two knocked out drug dealers in the back and wants to get the hell out of there. If he is interrogated over the fire while having two bodies in the RV… Well.

You could do that, or you could just not simply give up after seeing *one *episode. Breaking Bad certainly doesn’t suck, but like most shows it takes a bit for it to mature and really hit its mark. The high points of this show are really, really good. Bryan Cranston won the Emmy for best leading actor for like three years in a row. I think you’re giving up on a great show for the wrong reasons.

Not to be the rabid Breaking Bad fan who comes charging righteously into your thread to defend his show, but…

… your evaluation of the show does a great disservice to Gilligan and his stable of writers. Let me address some of your points:

Walt is well within his right to keep that information to himself. He was just told he had a terminal illness. When I was told that one of my close friends passed away, I didn’t tell anybody for close to two weeks, so shocked was I by the suddenness of his passing. People are very private about that kind of stuff. They want to deal with it on their own terms. It takes awhile to digest.

Knowing what I’ve just told you, it should come as no surprise that Walt’s subterfuge is not uncommon among people who’ve been diagnosed with illnesses that threaten to kill or disable them.

His wife was giving him a perfunctory birthday hand-job while tracking her E-Bay auctions. She wasn’t even looking at him. It was like the saddest hand-job in the world. Find me the person who could work up any enthusiasm for that.

He eats breakfast. That’s what he does. He’s the show’s breakfast eater.

It’s the pilot. You’ve got to give it some time. The writers had to cover a lot of ground in the opening episode. They can’t meaningfully develop the supporting cast when they have to get their main character from Point A (teaching chemisty at a public high-school) to Point B (cooking methamphetamine in an RV).

Come on. It clearly wasn’t a cell-phone. It was the video camera Jesse had brought along.

Well, I applaud you for giving it a shot.

If that’s your earnest feelings, then so be it. It’s my favorite show right now, but I can’t justify evangelizing the show to someone who claims there is absolutely nothing on television since All in the Family and Gunsmoke worth watching.

You have tastes and opinions I apparently don’t understand. I can’t help but feel you’re being unfair and painfully over-critical to modern prime-time programming for whatever reason – but, to each their own; it’s just entertainment. :shrug:

Let’s try this link to the thread which spawned this. It all begins on post #17.

Spoken like a gentleperson and I salute you.

He’s got a wee plaque that says something like ‘for research that contributed to the award of a Nobel Prize’. In other words, while he as a masters student, his project was one of the 50 projects done in one of 3 labs that eventually received a Nobel. He’s was one of the little people, and it was the high water mark of his life.

He’s shocked and in denial. Discussing it would make it real. Also, he’s worried about what his family will do without him.

Because it’s a great idea.

Black smoke, clear blue sky, brush fire country. The Painted Cave fire in Santa Barbara swept out of the hills and destroyed a hell of a lot of property. I suspect fire departments are pretty vigilant in dry areas.

I think part of the explanation for Walter’s peculiar reactions is the sudden alteration in his life. The diagnosis of cancer is catastrophic, yet liberating. His entry into the drug trade allows him to start reacting with violence, rather than reason, so the built up rage inside this everyman is suddenly freed. He’s doing these things for his family - they’re gonna need money - yet he can’t talk to them about it, and they really can’t understand the changes he’s going through. In some ways it’s a ‘good man pushed too far’ fantasy.

Really though, he’s the anti-Dexter.

Not to get too deep into this, but a few points.

I’m not saying it’s implausible that Walter would keep his cancer diagnosis to himself. But having him do so makes for an uninteresting character who stares into space a lot. It’s not up to me to assign Walter an intriguing personality, by guessing what he might be thinking. That’s the writer’s job, and it’s not being done here.

Of course, you can tell me that his character develops later throughout the series, but what a glacially paced story you’re going to have that way. I found this episode painfully slow to begin with.

And you don’t have inexpressive characters panic for no other reason than it’s ten minutes until the end of the show. It’s tacked on and unconvincing. All Walter has to do, is drive away, dump the dead bodies, and leave. Not drive like his ass is on fire. There was no one chasing him at that point. The sirens show up after the crash.

Oh, but he panics because he’s an ordinary man thrown into an extraordinary situation? He’s not used to killing people and he’s upset? Then how come he’s been Mr Cool until now? He’s able to keep mum about his terminal cancer and starting a life of crime, but a teeny little brush fire freaks him out? Total inconsistancy of character.

Yes, this show has won Emmys. I think that has more to do with a lack of competition than any true merit.

I strongly disagree. The writers are doing their well, since they don’t have to make everything super explicit.

And I think your assessment of Walt as “uninteresting” is really off the mark. Follow the show and you’ll see. There’s enough complexity in this character.

Breaking Bad can be sort of slow at times. I think the writers use this to their advantage, as some of the very best tensions come from scenes with outdrawn resolution. YMMV.

He is driving a meth lab. Which contains two knocked out bodies. Things are spiralling out of control. How is it unlikely that he would panic?

Good thing for Breaking Bad that it wasn’t up against Gunsmoke.

Based on comments you made in the previous thread, I get the impression that you do not like serial dramas. However, many of the most critically and popularly acclaimed shows of recent years have been serial dramas. So I’ll bet that you won’t like The Good Wife, Damages, Sons of Anarchy, The Sopranos, The West Wing or especially Lost, all of which were popular with audiences and critics, but all of which had season- or series-long arcs, along with single-episode stories. Instead, it appears that you’d prefer to watch simpler shows that wrap things up in thirty or sixty minutes.

I’m a little surprised at all the attention Two Many Cats is getting. If he wants to dismiss Breaking Bad after one episode and Mad Men after a clip show, then it’s his loss.

The greatest shows of the past decade take time to build their characters and story. They are not shows that focus on one episode of TV at a time. Unless you have the patience to sit through more than one episode you’re not going to enjoy these shows.

Because I’m about 2 seasons deep (along with SOA), I’d suggest Psych. The story arcs in that show are taken about as seriously as they are in The Simpsons.

I figured it might be your style from this remark in the other thread (bolding mine):

So, we both agree 100% that you have to stick with a show as the characters and plot develop, because that’s what we call plot and character development. :wink:

I guess that depends on what you consider to be slow-paced. There’s a lot going on under the surface as the pilot sets up the premise for the series. If you thought the set-up up of Walt’s character as shown to be a whitebread, milquetoast man who’s dignity and manhood has been slowly deflated by almost everyone around him; who learns he will now probably die within six months; has no real pension or security for his family upon his death; and the dawning of realization that he has powers beyond anyone ever thought him capable, including himself, to wield as a means to provide for the family he loves; culminating in the show-down in the desert between Crazy Eight and his cousin was slow, well… I’m honestly baffled.

Huh… Dead bodies. Are we so sure about that?

That’s just it, he’s been a hurricane underneath for most of his marriage and his teaching career. The cancer was the tipping point that made him realize he’s going to take control over every aspect of his life (see episode 5, Gray Matter)*.

Plus, because he’s human; this is all new to him, and he thought the jig was up before he really even got it started. He was so close, but totally naive and unprepared. It’s his consistent flaw. Perhaps he’s not as cold and calm as he believes himself to be.

*A spoiler from this episode, if you choose to finish out the season, maybe don’t click (although it doesn’t spoil much), but these are words from Walt from this episode, in which…

[spoiler]…Skyler, Walt’s wife, after he finally tells her he has cancer, holds an intervention with her sister Marie, her husband Hank, and their son Walt Jr. as to why they think he should go forth with chemotherapy and expensive treatment. She uses the “Conch Shell” method for everyone to take their turn discussing why they think Walt should go through with it. He’s forced to remain silent, as everyone gets their turn. Marie’s the last, and working at a hospital, thinks Walt shouldn’t and this takes Skyler by complete surprise, Hank wants to change his mind now to agree with Marie, and now, everyone is arguing and talking over each other, until Walt stands and blows out a whistle stopping everyone.

Walt Jr.: “This is so stupid.”

Walt grabs the “talking pillow.”

Walt: "Alright! I got the talking pillow now… okay?!"

He sits, everyone is tense.

Walt: "Now, we all, in this room. We love each other. We know that. We want what’s best for each other, and I know that. I am very thankful for that. But, uh – I want – what I want – what I need; is a choice.

Skyler: "What does that [sigh] mean?

Walt: "Sometimes I feel like I never, actually, make any of my own. Choices, I mean. [exasperated laugh] My entire life, it just seems I never… y’know I never had a real say; about any of it.

And this last one: Cancer… all I have left is how I choose to approach this.

Skyler: “Then make the right choice, Walt. You’re not the only one it affects. What about your son? Don’t you want to see your daughter grow up? I just…”

Walt: [waffling his hands and tears] "Of course I do.

Skyler, you’ve… read the statistics. [sigh] These doctors, talking about “surviving”. One year, two years; like it’s the only thing that matters. Well, what good is it if I’m – too sick to work. To enjoy a meal. [looks at Skyler] To make love.

For what time I have left, I wanna live in my own house. I wanna sleep in my own bed. I don’t wanna choke down 30 or 40 pills every single day and lose my hair, and lie around; too tired to get up.

And so nauseated, I can’t even move my head?

And you… cleaning up after me? [shaking his head in disgust] And me, some dead man, some artificially alive… just… marking time? No. no.

And that’s how you’d remember me.

That’s the worst part. So… that is my ‘thought process,’ Skyler.

Sorry… I choose not to do it."
[/spoiler]

Perhaps, but look at some other serial dramas that’ve won Emmys over the decades, and try to articulate why they did? You can always whip out the lack of competition argument. If it so happens that most of the shows you find worthy of Emmys just so happen to be within a certain range of television you were growing up with, you might consider the possibility of a bias on your part.

In the year I was born, 1973, here were the nominations for best dramas:

**Kung-Fu

Mannix

Hawaii Five-O

Cannon

Columbo

The Waltons** = Winner.
Here’s the nominations in the same category for 2010:

**True Blood

Mad Men** = Winner.

**Breaking Bad

Dexter

The Good Wife

Lost
**

And a wild card, 1962 (a date I asked my wife to pick randomly between 1950 and 1970):

**Hallmark Hall of Fame

The Naked City

Alcoa Premiere

Ben Casey

Dick Powell Show

The Defenders** = Winner.

I can’t argue with the winners for those nominated in any of these years. I have my personal favorites, but as you can see, I’d say for any given year there’s seems to be only two or three really good contenders. And if you could find a way to compare “quality” from year to year between the winners, can you say the Emmy Winner Studio One from 1952 is any better overall than Mission: Impossible from '68, Hill Street Blues in '82, NYPD Blue in '95, The West Wing in 2001, etc…?

Only because he chose to call attention to himself.

FWIW, I’m semi-interested in how one who had an interest in television sitcoms and drama, completely and utterly lost it, as I strongly disagree that there’s no shows airing today or since as worthy as All in the Family, Gunsmoke, or Barney Miller.

When this happened to me, I…oops, forgot witness protection deal.

Good Og, don’t mention Lost with those other shows. I’d still like all my time back that Lost took. Fucking polar bears, fucking black smoke, fucking lack of explanation.

I like that show, but because I only watched the first two episodes and gave up (maybe caught bits and peices of other ones). So, every once in a while over the coming months and years and I ask people things like “Hey, did you ever find out why all those trees where shaking?” or “Did you ever find out about that smoke?” just to see them say “:mad:NO:mad:Shut up:mad:” On the one hand it was kind of funny, on the other hand I felt kind of bad for the people that had so much time invested in a show that ended up resolving so few things (it did leave a lot of stuff hanging, right?). And everytime I see a post like yours I’m glad I never got in to it.

I mentioned Lost as an extreme example of a serial drama that the OP would hate and I agree that the writers for Lost never wrapped up everything in a nice package, but it was a fun show to watch and talk about.