Myth? Underwater explosions kill people from inside out?

I just finished reading “The Last Stand of the Tin Can Sailors”. Great book, but you guys don’t need the details. I do need to explain the setting…

It’s during World War Two. A few U.S. destroyers have been sunk, and the surviving crews are swimming on the surface. Many are worried that the depth charges on the sinking ships are not set to safe, and will detonate once they reach the right depth.

There is also a couple instances of passing Japanese destroyers, and the survivors worrying about the enemy dropping a charge to kill all the survivors in one fell swoop.

But the method of death is not something I’d ever considered…it’s not the explosion that would kill directly. I quote page 334, “A depth charge that burst underwater produced a wave of pressure that could blow a man apart from the inside out. Sailors were trained to cover their buttocks, or lift them out of the water, to avoid the potentially fatal enema…”

This sounds like BS to me. But it also seems at least slightly plausible (the enema part at least).

So has this actually been documented as a cause of death?

Brandon

It is at least superficially plausible. From this pdf , pages 7 and 9 respectively:

http://www.storysmith.net/Articles/Blast%20Injuries%200406.pdf
Medium in Which the Explosion Occurs Another important factor that defines blast injury patterns is the medium in which the blast occurs. An underwater blast wave causes far more damage, because water is essentially incompressible.2,16A wave resulting from an underwater blast travels farther and moves faster than a wave from a similar explosion in the air. Blast injuries in water occur at greater distances and may be much more severe.17,18Personnel treading water are at higher risk for abdominal than thoracic injury from an underwater explo-sion. Fully submerged victims are at equal risk of com-bined thoracic and abdominal blast injuries, but the blast injury occurs at 3 times the distance from the underwater explosion”
Gastrointestinal Damage Gastrointestinal injuries were once thought to occur with the same frequency as lung injury. A recent, large Israeli case series found that abdominal injuries were seen only with massive trauma.33In this series, all of the patients sustained their injuries in open air. The patient may have a greater risk for gastrointestinal injury when exposed to an underwater blast.17The GI injury of primary blast injury is inconsistent in presentation. Gastrointestinal injuries may not be appar-ent externally. They have a great potential to cause death and may be much more difficult to protect against. The injury may consist of hemorrhage beneath the visceral peritoneum or may extend into the mesentery, colon, and cecum.36,37The colon is the most common site of both hem-orrhage and perforation.17,36This is thought to be because the colon has the most bowel gas accumulation in the GI tract”

However, a bit more searching reveals that it is the gas-filled spaces of the body that are most vulnerable to shockwaves when immersed.

From here:
http://www.scuba-doc.com/uwblast.html

"MECHANISM OF BLAST INJURY IN WATER
The blast wave passes through the body as it is of similar consistency to water. Molecules are displaced very little except in gas spaces capable of compression. Damage is at the gas water interfaces within the body. The gas in the gas filled cavities is instantaneously compressed as the pressure wave passes & the walls of the spaces are torn or shredded as in barotrauma. Damage occurs in the lungs, intestines, sinus & ear cavities. In the lungs the damage is not due to pressure transmitted via the upper airways (as in air blasts) but as a result of transmission of the wave directly through the thoracic wall.

ANIMAL EXPERIMENTS
INTESTINAL damage: subserous & submucosal haemorrhage; perforation. No kidney, bladder, liver or gallbladder damage. If the thorax & abdomen were immersed, the lungs would be more affected. If only the abdomen were immersed the intestines were most affected with rectal bleeding.
The above results show the importance of the air-water interface in damage from an underwater blast. If 3 loops of bowel are experimentally occluded, collapsing 1, filling 2 with saline & filling 3 with air, only the air loop is damaged."

So if you’re in the water, an explosion shockwave is more likely to damage your lungs than give you a lethal enema! If you’re half-in, half out, then you can suffer intestinal damage and the consequent rectal bleeding may have spawned the legend of the enema effect. I suspect that covering your buttocks isn’t going to help very much, whatever the case.

I’m puzzled about how practical a suggestion it would ever be.

If you’re in the water, there’s nothing to climb out onto, how can you lift your arse out of the water without submerging your face?

If you’re in the water and there is something to climb out onto, wouldn’t you already have done so?

What if the sailors were pulling a Titanic and hanging onto small to mid-sized debris? Depending on the type of debris, it might be possible for them to pull themselves up awkwardly, but not practical to maintain that position for an extended period.

I’m sure that whoever suggested covering your buttocks was just covering his ass.

Surely in order to save face.

I don’t have anything useful to answer your question, but damn wasn’t that a hell of a story.

What matt said.

In an air blast, I always plug my ears, but that wouldn’t help any underwater. As matt’s site suggests, since the human body is basically water, there’s not really a loss of energy at the water-human interface, so the shockwave is going to go directly into your lungs.

Even though it wouldn’t help, if was underwater and saw a blast, I’d probably cover my ears out of habit, even though I knew it wasn’t going to help. Then again, I’d probably be too late, since I usually start to cover them when I see the blast, and the shockwave would be traveling much faster through the water.

Thanks for the info! I guess it’s one of those half truths, and at least possible. I would have never considered the lungs…but it does make sense!

And yes Billdo that is an amazing story. I’ve read it in a couple other books, but it’s still amazing each time!

It sounds like a really good whoosh to me. “Trained to cover their buttocks, or at least lift them out of the water???”
Somebody hand me a whoopee cushion and a joy buzzer, please.
greatshakes