As many of you may have heard, the NAACP is threatening to launch a boycott against TV networks, and their beef is that blacks have been “underrepresented” in new TV shows. IIRC, the US population is roughly 15% black, whereas the new TV shows contain 12% black characters. (I saw these figures in an earlier thread, I don’t remember the name.)
It appears to me that the NAACP has gone mad with power.
First of all, TV shows are fiction. Since when did works of fiction have to emulate, represent, or reflect the real world in any way, shape, or form.
And if the figures that I mentioned are correct, I hardly think the difference is worth launching a boycott over.
Is the NAACP justified in its threat, or are they just full of s–t?
Life is a tragedy for those who feel and a comedy for those who think.
I wasn’t aware that the NAACP had so much “power” that they could “go mad” with it. :::see my bemused look:::
I suppose I just assumed that the announcement was some sort of political ploy, along the lines of Mel Brooks’ “we’ve got to protect our phony-baloney jobs.” Give an interview, stage a protest, arrange a boycott, I think it pretty much boils down to the same thing.
Frankly, I don’t think the networks are terribly worried. Other special-interest groups have tried to arrange boycotts before, and you see how much the television industry has altered in order to accommodate them. :rolleyes:
“Why, sometimes I’ve believed as many as six impossible things before breakfast!” - the White Queen