Name a place you will never go into that's popular.

And the thing is, Old Navy stuff isn’t even particularly stylish. You can safely assume that once a clothing trend appears in a major chain like Old Navy, that style has been dead for a while among the people who set the styles.

If you want more info about this process of styles moving from the hip to the mainstream, there are any number of books that discuss it, from The Theory of the Leisure Class to The Tipping Point and so forth.

Hardee’s, because they have horrible drive-thru service (but at least they’re slow)
McDonald’s, because I used to work there and have witnessed the horrors
Walmart, because they’re crowded, dirty, and dimly lit. Kind of like being in a bat-filled cave, with less guano.

You were thisclose from saying, “Dang fool kids these days!” weren’t you, Kid_A? Admit it! :smiley:

You can also look at bands that have tried to circumvent the awful Ticketmaster process. The Grateful Dead did this for years and years, and still does (more or less).

kmart, where they still exist. all of the stores i have been in are grimey and staffed with brain dead incompetents. plus, i hate dealing with the hoards of similar brain dead incompetents i usually find shopping there.

Even though there aren’t any Chik-Fil-A joints local to me, I’ve always looked for them when travelling because they really do know how to make fine tasting chicken. So it bothers me to learn about their stupid anti-gay policies. Especially because individual local Chik-Fil-A restaurants seem to be very active in their communities in supporting blood drives, homeless shelters, school fundraisers, after-school programs, food drives, etc. (If you want a cite, I invite you to query Google on keywords “Chick-fil-a” and “donations”, which I did in one of my attempts to find specific instances of anti-gay foundations receiving funding from them.)

This presents me with something of a quandry. Not so much in the Oh shit, I really love their chicken but I really hate their politics way - in that case I’d simply find another fried chicken place - but because boycotting them for a policy I find offensive would seem to hurt important local programs that I tend to support.

Well, it’s commendable that you would feel moved to boycott Chick-Fil-A for their corporate bigotry, but if they are doing good things in your community, then that must also be taken into consideration.

As it happens, I’d boycott them anyway for their contribution to illiteracy with the inane “Eat Mor Chiken” ad campaign.

FWIW, Cracker Barrel rescinded there explicit anti-gay hiring policies and in fact now include sexual orientation in their non-discrimination policy

Sorry to hijack, but can someone tell me what a Chick-Fil-A is? Is it like a McDonald’s or Burger King? No, I’m not kidding - I’m from the suburbs of Chicago - we don’t HAVE those.

Don’t you read Snopes?

It’s a mysteriously popular chicken-based fast food place that serves extra-salted processed chicken products with waffle fries.

Huh – I always saw those as inspirational, suggesting that even a creature with bovine intelligence could, through hard work and fear for its life, learn rudimentary communication skills.

And it’s not like a place called Chik-Fil-A is going to get rid of spelling errors by ending this one ad campaign, anyway.

Daniel

I am 99.9% sure that the suburban stores you speak of are not selling bootleg T-shirts that you can get for 5 bucks at outside shows.

You do realize that in order for a store like you describe to sell Sex Pistols or Rage T-Shirts, one of two things has to happen:

  1. The Band (or it’s management) has to agree to the selling of offical T-shirts at that store or chain. Or they sell their likeness and the store produces it’s own “offical” T-shirts.

  2. The Band (or it’s management) sells all of its merch rights to a mech company and they distribute the merch as they see fit. The band usually gets an upfront fee for the rights and a percentage of sales. Sometimes this agreement includes merch at shows, sometimes it does not.

Either way, by your definition, that is “selling out”. I think you need to lighten up. Outside of touring, bands make most of their money off merch. Would you rather they quit making music because the can’t make enough money?

There are a lot worse ways to “sell out” then by selling T-shirts at suburban record stores.

If a kid wants a Rage Against the Machine T-Shirt, it should be accessable to him/her.

Subway - I hate the way the Bread smells, when I go in there I want to vomit, I smell rotten bread.

Yes, what’s your point?

If the money Monaghan gets from ordinary schlubs buying his pizza goes to a murderous cause, it doesn’t matter what the “official” policy is. My money isn’t going to get anywhere near his blood-stained hands.

This surprised me. (I’m a semi-regular there and have generally been treated okay, and the hostess’ explanation here is bizarre.) If I didn’t know you, I’d probably think that there’s some other (legitimate or not) reason she didn’t like your group.

(Random briefly reviews past occasions when both he and Gundy were at a bar.)

Hmm… Never mind.

Heh!

I agree, but the store just sucks. I feel for those that have to work there or places that don’t have a Target.

[sub]BTW…are all brain dead incompetent, or is it the other way around? :smiley: [/sub]

So…why do you call it a boycott? Surely there are other states you don’t have any desire to go to? Well, heck, what do I know, maybe you’re chomping at the bit to go to North Dakota! (I don’t say South Dakota, because doesn’t everyone want to go to the Corn Palace or Wall Drug?) I mean, I have no desire to ever go to West Virginia, either, but I’m hardly boycotting the place.

[hijack]
In my hitchhiking days I got a ride in South Dakota that took me 60 miles out of his way so I could see the Corn Palace. After that, I knew my life was complete.
[/hijack]

The story in this thread by TVGuy.

That was enough for me. And actually, your linked article, about them apologizing for airing a comercial on a gay marriage program left a rather bad taste in my mouth. I’m comfortable with my decision, even if it means I don’t eat there anymore.

Anecdotes are good enough? Good heavens. Isn’t it much more likely that that particular manager of that particular restaurant had the problem, that it’s not a policy - official or not - of its restaurants?

I can see avoiding that location; my apologies if that’s what you mean. But if you mean you’ll never set foot in any of their restaurants anywhere in the world because of the actions of one manager… well, that seems pretty bizarre to me.