Name that fallacy (alternative word definitions)

Factual Questions
1

Is there a official logical fallacy that covers equating two or more alternative meanings or connotations of the same word in an argument to reach a faulty conclusion?

Examples:
Animals aren’t allowed in the hosptial
Humans are animals, (not plants)
Therefore humans are not allowed in the hospital

Criminals should be locked up for the good of society.
Entering the country without documentation is a crime
Therefore people who enter the country without documentation should be locked up for the good of society.

2
3

And done in one.

Thanks

4

My favorite example of this:

A crust of bread is better than nothing.
Nothing is better than true love.
Therefore, a crust of bread is better than true love.

5

A baby is not worth two cents.

Proof:
A baby is a crier.
A crier is a messenger.
A messenger is one sent.
One cent is not worth two cents.
Therefore, a baby is not worth two cents.

6

Some dogs have fuzzy ears.
My dog has fuzzy ears.
Therefore, my dog is some dog!

7

Assertion: A beehive is a rotten potato.

Proof:
A beehive is a bee-holder.
A beholder is a spectator.
A specked tater is a rotten potato.

Assertion: A piece of paper is a lazy dog.

Proof:
A piece of paper is an ink-lined plane.
An inclined plane is a slope up.
A slow pup is a lazy dog.

8

12-year-old Roger, 10-year-old Floyd, and 7-year-old Dale are brothers. Of Roger’s 2 brothers, Floyd is the older one. Of Dale’s 2 brothers, Floyd is the younger one. So, Floyd is his older brother’s older brother. Floyd is also his younger brother’s younger brother.