And they’re going to take steps to correct it.
Nature, the magazine, mostly employs women on their staff, despite the predominance of men in the relevant fields, in addition to which they are making a conscious effort to put women forward because of their genitals rather than their work.
So yes, very sexist indeed, just not against women.
On the other hand, Reality doesn’t have an obviously liberal bias:
According to the article:
That’s about 1-2 women more than you’d expect by random chance. Am I being whooshed?