Nefertiti on the Discovery Channel

OK, so I watched the Discovery Channel special on Nefertiti the other night. Most interesting, but it raised a few questions. I plan to get a few books and do a little google-ing, but I thought surely a Doper might also have some answers. So:

Who is Joann Fletcher, exactly? She’s described as a “freelance” Egyptologist. I’m assuming that means she’s not associated with a University.(?) So how is she considered by others in the profession? A crackpot or a respected Egyptologist or somewhere in-between?

I’m not necessarily inclined to disagree that she may have found Nefertiti, but some of the things that were mentioned, I wondered about. For example, what about this theory that Nefertiti became Smenkhare? Is this considered one of a numer of theories, a real possibility or something out of left field? A quick Google seems to indicate that this is not a new theory, but I couldn’t tell how much credence it has.

And what about her looks? I understand that the literature of the time all indicated that she was a great beauty - but some of thos carvings do NOT show an attractive woman. The program kept talking about the famous bust in the Berlin museum and whether the facial reconstruction of the mummy would match that bust. But how do they know the bust is the more realistic portrait? As I mentioned, some of the carvings show a woman who does NOT seem to resemble the woman in the bust at all.

Oh, and one more thing. In the program, Fletcher talks of many “discoveries” she’s made which she believes add credence to her Nefertitit-as-Smenkhare theory. One is the tomb of her husband Akhenaten - according to Fletcher the figures on each corner of the actual coffin are Nefertitit herself, in a protective pose. According to Fletcher, this shows that Nefertitit was still alive when Akhenaten died. Huh? Why?

Enough questions for one morning. I obviously need to read some books.

I think Fletcher is a respected hairstyle expert, based on the fact that I’ve seen her in so many documentaries identifying wigs.

My opinion on the wall-carvings, (and I am not an expert by any means) is that tomb and stele art weren’t really expected to be realistic. In Akhenaten’s time, Egyptian art underwent a massive change. Before, wall-figures were done in a special, almost mathematical-style formula with no respect to realism. The drawing of a Pharaoh was immediately identifiable because they all looked alike.

When Akhenaten came to power, the representations became more fluid and “wavy.” Did the new art have any more respect for realism than it did previously, or was the new style just that-- a style, but not necessarily intended to be an accurate portrait? I don’t know, but I don’t think that accuracy really mattered to the Egyptians when it came to tomb art. The point of the representation was so that the Gods would remember the subject and their name, not necessarily what they looked like.

Well that would definitely explain the discrepency. I didn’t know that the art wasn’t supposed to be realistic. Interesting.

Thanks!