This was inspired by the thead on the old convetion which brought the U.S. from the Articles to the current constitution.
I’ve heard various fringe groups talk about this and all sorts of rules for calling one.
Where does all that come from?
This was inspired by the thead on the old convetion which brought the U.S. from the Articles to the current constitution.
I’ve heard various fringe groups talk about this and all sorts of rules for calling one.
Where does all that come from?
A previous thread on this subject:
http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?threadid=45998
Well, OK. Same title, different question.
Here’s the the Constitution says:
which I suppose is applicable. Do people take this to mean not just ammendment but the entire thing can be re-written?
If two-thirds of the states demanded a Constitutional Convention, the result would indeed be a body similar to that which was called to amend the Articles of Confederation in 1787. The Convention would be able to propose multiple amendments to the Constitution; this is plainly set forth in the language of Art. V.
More interesting is the question of whether the Convention could propose a whole new Constitution, in the same way the Constitutional Convention of 1787 discarded the Articles of Confederation and started anew. It is doubtful that we shall ever need to know.