New Deal Democrat's (very welcome) banning

[AqualungBats5th]

@magellan01

It’s a big world. There are hateful people in it. It would serve us all well to have thicker skins. Tolerating what some anonymous poster on a message board says requires a simple “medium” thickness.

Isn’t it funny how often straight white dudes have opinions about how other people should have thicker skins?

That always amuses me.

[magellan01]

@AqualungBats5th

Isn’t it funny how often straight white dudes have opinions about how other people should have thicker skins?

That always amuses me.

Just be careful that tears of laughter that might sprout from your amusement don’t stain that pink linen sundress.

[Chimera]

@AqualungBats5th

Isn’t it funny how often straight white dudes have opinions about how other people should have thicker skins?

That always amuses me.

Isn’t is funny how people who scream the loudest about “straight white dudes” are always the most hypersensitive crybabies on Earth?

[Fenris]

Originally Posted by BigT
None of that actively hurts people. And if you seriously believe that words don’t hurt people, why are you on a board with moderation against being a jerk?
[/quote]

@Shodan

If you think words do hurt people simply by being said, why are you on a board with a Pit?

Because he’s here to SAVE us from ourselves and at great personal cost. A terrible cost. Many people don’t know that mean words on message boards kill people–not through suicide or something, no–like in the “drinking clorox” sense.

Do you remember Tinkerbell from the novel Peter Pan? When children didn’t believe in fairies she died a little and got weaker. When they DID believe in fairies, Tinkerbell got stronger and healthier. BigT is like Tinkerbell, but not nearly as tough and resilient. Any sort of message board negativity shortens his life and he’s still here to SAVE US ALL!. Wotta guy.

Why your post alone, Shodan, probably took, 2, 3 months from him.

Why must you be so mean to him by disagreeing and stuff?

[Shodan]

@Fenris

When they DID believe in fairies, Tinkerbell got stronger and healthier.

There’s a gay marriage joke in there somewhere, but I am afraid to post it. It must be my genes.

Regards,
Shodan

[Exapno_Mapcase]

@AqualungBats5th

Isn’t it funny how often straight white dudes have opinions about how other people should have thicker skins?

That always amuses me.

As a straight white dude, I’ll agree that this is absolutely true.

@Chimera

Isn’t is funny how people who scream the loudest about “straight white dudes” are always the most hypersensitive crybabies on Earth?

This ain’t.

If you’re not part of a group that’s been oppressed in your culture, shut up on the subject. You’re wrong in your whining 100% of the time.

[Chimera]

You’ll have to forgive me if I don’t have time to wallow in shame and guilt at the very idea that white straight males are the source of all evils in the world. If that’s your thing, knock yourself out.

[The_Man_In_Black]

@Marley23

I’m sorry, but I don’t believe this. Creationism does hurt people - it misinforms them and it lays the groundwork for the banning or diluting of science education in schools. And you can be a racist without hurting other people unless you are arguing that having unpleasant feelings is inherently hurtful to other people. I think applying that idea to a message board would be problematic to say the least.

You are saying being a Creationist is as bad as being racist? That is a fucked up thing to say.

[Left_Hand_of_Dorkness]

@Chimera

You’ll have to forgive me if I don’t have time to wallow in shame and guilt at the very idea that white straight males are the source of all evils in the world. If that’s your thing, knock yourself out.

No, no, you don’t have time. Run along, run along!

For the record, nobody was saying that’s what you or anyone else should do. But if you don’t have time to wallow in shame, surely you don’t have time to read posts carefully and for nuance.

[Chimera]

Was kinda certain I had.

Mags suggests having a thicker skin about what strangers on the internet say.
AB5 decides this is the perfect opening for his own hatred against straight white males*
I poke a stick at that.
Exapno decides to tell me that since I am one of the oppressors**, anything I have to say on the subject is 100% wrong.

• In a thread where some people want to ban people for racism or hate speech.
  ** Apparently not hearing the cognitive dissonance of (*) over the sound of his own self-loathing.

So, Racism = Bad, unless it’s biased hatred of straight white male oppressors. Got it.

[Rand_Rover]

@magellan01

First, “racist” can be used two ways. I’ve seen here more than a few times someone trying to get a poster to admit that taking race into consideration makes someone a “racist”. Then shifting from the innocent scientific connotation to the KKK variety: “He’s a self-admitted RACIST!”

Second, there is a factually correct answer as to whether the differences in races are at all manifested in mental function. Whether you like it or not has no bearing on that reality. It’s akin to arguing the race plays a role in one race generally being taller or having darker skin. But the reality is that many people simply do not want to have the conversation at all. It makes them uncomfortable, so they seek to shout down the person and start Pit threads in order to make the topic verboten and paint the other person in the debate as a bad or evil person: a “RACIST”!!!

Reality has no such personal bias. What I find funny about this is that many of the people so desperate to shut down the discussion are this who claim to have such a high regard for science and the truth.

Maybe Whites have greater mental abilities than Blacks. Maybe they don’t. Maybe Asians have greater mental abilities than Whites. Maybe they don’t. It seems obvious that even if this is generally true, that the differences are small enough that we can expect any individual of any one race to outperform an individual from either of the other. So, I don’t really care what the finding are either way.

But then WHY have the discuss, right. Well, science often explores things that we don’t know the benefit of. That’s the dispassionate nature of scientific inquiry, isn’t it. Also, it’s not like the subject has been brought up for us in the real world. Look at SAT scores, look at tests for Police and Fire Departments. Why is it, for instance, that Blacks score so poorly in relation to Whites. The might be that the difference can be attributed—100%—to culture.It may also be the fact that the attribution can be 99%. Or 84%. Whatever.

I just don’t get that people on a debate board devoted to fighting ignorance would want to shout people down and close off a line of discussion. The crackpots will be made to look like fools more effectively without people trying to label them as RACISTS and such. Also, if you think someone is a jerk you (pl) can just bow out of the discussion. And there’s even a handy-dandy little feature called “Ignore” that saves you from being affected by even seeing the words these racists spew.

I have little feeling about NDD, but I am troubled by this mob rule of sorts. It’s a friggin debate board. People should be able to debate pretty much anything. And the competence with which one argues a particular point should not be conflated with validity of the point being argued. Someone might not be able to argue a conservative point as well as Bricker, or make as good a case for the support of Israel as FinnAgain, but those are problems with the poster’s ability rather than the validity of the argument. And certainly not the threshold a topic must reach to even be discussed.

Amen. It’s really about time to give up on the “fighting ignorance” motto. There are whole swaths of ignorance that the posters on this board largely support and cling to rather than fight.

[AqualungBats5th]

@Chimera

AB5 decides this is the perfect opening for his own hatred against straight white males*

You’re reading things into what I said that weren’t actually there, but thanks for your posts because they are comedy gold.

Guys, I don’t think Chimera has a thick enough skin for this sort of discussion.

[Chimera]

This wasn’t there? :dubious:

Isn’t it funny how often straight white dudes have opinions about how other people should have thicker skins?

[Left_Hand_of_Dorkness]

@Chimera

This wasn’t there? :dubious:

How you’re getting from that to hatred of straight white males is where the comedy comes in.

Hey Aqualung: I’m a straight white male. How do you feel about me? Be honest now.

[John_Mace]

@Left_Hand_of_Dorkness

How you’re getting from that to hatred of straight white males is where the comedy comes in.

He didn’t say anything about hatred. He said it was a bigoted comment, and it was.

[tomndebb]

@Chimera

Mags suggests having a thicker skin about what strangers on the internet say.

OK

@Chimera

AB5 decides this is the perfect opening for his own hatred against straight white males*

Not remotely close to what he actually said, of course.

@Chimera

I poke a stick at that.

In a way that demonstrates that you, at least, probably need to follow magellan01’s advice.

@Chimera

Exapno decides to tell me that since I am one of the oppressors**, anything I have to say on the subject is 100% wrong.

Interesting interpretation, but not supported by the text.

[Measure_for_Measure]

If I ran into a well informed scientific creationist crackpot, I’d probably drop by the talkorigins.org archive if I wanted to brush up upon my knowledge of the evolution of the eye. If a bigot wanted to discuss racial differentiation in IQ testing, I could probably work from memory. But if I wanted an outline of the reasons why race isn’t a scientifically coherent term from a biological perspective (as opposed to a sociological one) then I’d probably search this message board. Where else am I going to go?

Thanks to all undertaking the unpleasant task of garbage collection in such threads. For the sake of your sanity, you might want to keep your arguments tight, brief and -this is important- repetitive. It seems to me that crafting an optimal set of responses to these bozos shouldn’t be too hard, but then again I don’t frequent those sorts of threads.

[Left_Hand_of_Dorkness]

@John_Mace

He didn’t say anything about hatred.

@Chimera

AB5 decides this is the perfect opening for his own hatred against straight white males

What?

[mister_nyx]

@magellan01

I don’t get you guys. Really. Why the desire for the echo chamber?

@magellan01

+1

Lol at this inadvertent illustration of the actual echo chamber.

[QUOTE=Shodan]
Is there anyone who disagrees with you about race that you enjoy debating, and that you learn from?
[/QUOTE]

Thanks for saying straight out what so many other dopers tried to sort of edge around. You, like them, enjoy the company of out-and-out racists and feel that that’s something you benefit from.

The thing that is sort of astounding is that there’s such a large group of people who simultaneously believe that this place is some sort of group of intelligent people having intelligent debates, and that there’s something to be learned from hearing virulent racists explain why people with certain skin colors are inferior.

[QUOTE=Chimera]
You’ll have to forgive me if I don’t have time to wallow in shame and guilt at the very idea that white straight males are the source of all evils in the world. If that’s your thing, knock yourself out.
[/QUOTE]

This post certainly suggests that you have an ample capacity to whine.

[QUOTE=Chimera]
So, Racism = Bad, unless it’s biased hatred of straight white male oppressors. Got it.
[/QUOTE]

So now you’re accusing people of racism against you. Interesting.

[tomndebb]

@mister_nyx

The thing that is sort of astounding is that there’s such a large group of people who simultaneously believe that this place is some sort of group of intelligent people having intelligent debates, and that there’s something to be learned from hearing virulent racists explain why people with certain skin colors are inferior.

Not exactly: The Teeming Millions are identified on the Straight Dope site as

thousands of the smartest, hippest people on the planet, plus a few total dipsticks.

The people to whom you object are the total dipsticks. ::: shrug :::

We don’t learn anything from them, (aside from learning a bit about the squirrelly nature of things inside their skulls), but rebutting their odd claims provides other readers with the knowledge to not be misled by bold claims from the racists, CT proponents, and other misguided folks spouting nonsense in the world.