I’m not a smoker but from what I’ve learned these are far worse than regular cigarettes. And that there are over half of the states in the US requiring they be sold over the other type is alarming.
So…could you point us in the direction of this information that says they’re far worse, or do we just have to take your (and the commenters on that petition site’s) word?
Edit: That first link is clearly pro fire safe cigarettes, so we’re only getting one side of the issue. All I can tell from the other site is that a lot of smokers are convinced there are other “chemicals” in these new cigarettes that must be so much worse for you than what’s already in regular cigarettes.
The only thing I had heard about them was that they supposedly taste worse. On the other hand, Illinois required fire-safe cigarettes starting on Jan. 1, 2008, six months before I quit the p-funks–I didn’t even know anything had changed until, like, April of that year.
They don’t taste any different but they don’t stay lit either. It’s very inconsistent. Sometimes, if you put a cigarette down in an ashtray, it’ll burn all the way down but they’ll sometimes go out between drags. The tobacco seems to burn faster than the paper so it smothers itself.
I linked to the official website and then to an online petition— I didn’t consider that the topic might be unknown to responders.
The information I read regarding anti-FSC came from two blogs, and I didn’t think that would support a valid argument against FSCs. (I’ll go back and see if I can locate a link to one of those blogs.) I was looking for user-feedback (like jasonh300, thank you) and opinions on how the federal government is restricting the sale of cigarettes by pushing these on the public. I’ll come back to this after I find substantiated reports regarding adverse health reactions.