It’s August 12, 2010 and lost letters of Abraham Lincoln are found in a trunk. Love letters. To a man.
They are explicit and unambiguous. Honest Abe was honestly gay.
What would happen? How much would his reputation suffer? Would there be any chance such a revelation would help with gay acceptance? Would the GOP still trumpet itself as “the party of Lincoln”? Would people just refuse to believe it, no matter what evidence came out? Would it matter?
Technically, that would make Abe bisexual, not homosexual, as there is no disputing that he had sexual relations with women.
I would expect a lot of people to deny the evidence, try to prove it fraudulent, etc, even if it was solidly proven. People have amazing capacity for self-deception.
Not sure that it would make any difference except to the rabid southerners - the type who call the Civil War “The War of Northern Aggression”. I’d call them Republicans too, but given that Abe was a Republican, well…
The more conclusive the evidence, the more vociferously the Republicans would deny its authenticity. At some point Republicans/conservatives will place liberals into the position of having to prove some minor, yet unverifiable aspect of the newly unearthed information and, being unable to do so, liberals will, once again, be successfully cast by conservatives as somehow either making the entire thing up, or possessing an agenda the sole purpose of which is to destroy the US.
For me, you’d have to have some pretty compelling evidence that he wasn’t banging his wife on a regular basis for me to accept him as The Gabe, either way, I’d be kickin’ back with a tall cold glass of Who Gives a Fuck, but that’s just me.
Sexual orientation is defined by attraction, not behavior. Lots of gay men have had sex with women or been married to them. That doesn’t make them bisexual.
Plenty of 100% homosexuals have had sexual relations with people of the opposite sex . . . especially that long ago.
Even if this revelations didn’t matter to anyone else, it would certainly matter to gay people . . . even more so to the Log Cabin Republicans. And hopefully, one possible effect would be a lessening of homophobia among African Americans.
Well, it’s not Aug. 12, 2010. I haven’t lived that long and either have you.
So what? Does that mean that he wasn’t the 16th President of the United States or Commander in Chief during the Civil War? Does that mean that he didn’t issue the Emancipation Proclamation? Does that mean that he wasn’t assassinated or that he was assassinated because he was gay?
I think it will somewhat cloud his reputation with a certain group of people, but by and large not make too much of a difference as to his legacy. for comparison consider Jefferson and Sally Hemings.
I agree. How many people would bother to read the letters in question? A bunch of academics, then they would write papers, then the newspapers would take an angle on it and then the fringe news people would try to sell their angle. It would be very easy to just decide it is too muddled to bother with, and who cares anyway, just like so many other topics of debate. It might be fun to watch the GOP try to use this to get the gay vote.
Personally, its easy to picture him married to a woman without forming a mental image of him actually having sex. Now that the letters spell it out I’m having a hard time not picturing a pair of pale old Abes, naked except for top hats, in a tangle of limbs.
Similarly, if there were a letter from Lincoln specifically declining a gay man’s advances and spelling out that he was not himself gay and had no interest in homosexual liasons, that segment of people who want to believe Lincoln was gay would work around it.
::shrug::
People are going to believe what they want to believe either way, I reckon.
I wonder if it would have some sort of effect on the tolerance for homosexuality in the black community. But I doubt most people on this baord would care regardless of the color of their skin.
I dunno, I think some middle of the roaders who are just going along with an anti-gay agenda out of cultural inertia might be inspired to actually, ya know, examine the issue and decide to swing behind Abe (snerk). Don’t know if that would represent a significant number. Especially over time, I mean, with solid evidence, after 10 years ‘StaightAber’ could be the new birther.