Seriously, you had one job; to provide links. And you fucked that up.
Here’s the actual start of the argument, from another thread (FYI, I’m quoting only the relevant parts of the posts):
I left in that last post of yours as a gratuitous slam. **Kimstu **tried to explain the concept to you using a simple analogy with dogs and cows and you had a (hopefully feigned) hysteric breakdown because you thought she was comparing special ed students to cows. You have unique reading comprehension.
Note in the third post above, me explaining the concept to you using numbers. Notice how those are basically the same numbers **Damuri **used to try to claim that I was wrong. Interesting, isn’t it, that if **Damuri **is correct, you must be wrong? That’s why I was so surprised that you took his side. (actually, as per your usual, I could tell you just didn’t have the intellectual horsepower to think through the consequences of your position).
The argument in this thread is me repeating the argument in verbal form (I.e., to quote myself from that post and in this thread: “So your claim is that regular black schoolchildren receive less funding than regular white schoolchildren, and special education black schoolchildren receive less funding than special education white schoolchildren, but that there are enough special education black schoolchildren to make overall spend higher for black schoolchildren, even though they’re being discriminated against on a like-to-like basis”). Then **Damuri **misunderstood what I was saying (and also didn’t have context because he was jumping into an argument that was continuing from a prior thread), giving basically exactly the same numerical example that I did (while claiming that it proved that I was wrong), and you hoping so badly that I was wrong about something that you took **Damuri’s **side, even though **Damuri **being right means you must be wrong.