New Yorker article: What Exxon Knew About Climate Change

I was aware, of course, of Exxon’s involvement in climate-denial campaigns. What I wasn’t aware of was their involvement in some of the original research. They haven’t been deluding themselves with their denial campaigns. They knew full well what the science said and they pushed their lies anyway.

I thought this information came out a while ago and was maybe just picking up steam now.

I would like to see it come up in presidential debates. When there is proof that Big Oil not only knew about climate change 35 years ago but also went to great efforts to cover it up, it’s really hard to keep denying it. But I am sure they will still find a way.

There is a book out there called Merchants of Doubt, that discusses this in detail. I recently watched the movie of the same name, and it was disturbing and depressing, saying much the same thing as your New Yorker article said: the tobacco industry had become masters at casting doubt on the evidence against their product and diverting the blame to other things (couch catching fire when you smoke? It’s the couch’s fault!) - and the energy industry has harnessed that expertise to do the same for climate change. Makes you wonder where they’re living that they think climate change won’t ever affect them or their descendants.

If you’re a movie-watcher, I recommend the movie. If you’re a bookworm, well, I suspect the book is probably worthwhile too.

They figure that it won’t be too much bother to a very rich person in the next 20 years or so. And they don’t give a damn about their descendents or yours.

They are selfish, self-centered, shallow people, focused on short term acquisition of wealth.

Exactly, they will just use their huge profits to make themselves comfortable and a howdy fuck you to everyone else.

I remember how many critics of the deniers, contrarians and skeptics made the point that the fossil fuel industry would had spend billions to find and promote the evidence that debunked the idea that CO2 and other global warming gases were going to be a problem. If the evidence existed.

As it turns out just like the tobacco industry they found early on what was likely to happen and instead of looking to help to control emissions they decided to support the forces of FUD.

I was reading some of Fiorina’s comments on climate change and it seems the other Republican approach is not to deny climate change but to deny that there is anything we can do about it because if just the U.S. changed it wouldn’t make that big of a difference. So apparently that makes it okay to keep polluting like we don’t give a damn about future generations let alone our own.

Not being able to make any difference is just a load of hooey because other countries are making efforts to decrease carbon emissions and if we don’t also make an effort it makes us look like the big old selfish douche-bags the rest if the world already thinks we are. Not to mention that the scientists that talked about climate change, which the moderates are now not denying, are the same ones that say there are things we can do to at least not make things worse.