NFL free agency time!

Football fans: time to talk about offseason moves. Draft talk also welcome.
My 49ers went and did something good, signing cornerback Nate Clements for perhaps a bit too much money, but we can handle it. They also landed safety Michael Lewis and big-ass nose tackle Aubrayo Franklin. It’s no secret the 49ers needed defensive help, and I think things are looking up. I had wanted Adalius Thomas, too, but the Patriots decided to actually spend money and messed that up for us.

What has your team done and what do you think about it?

Speaking as an Eagles fan, you might have landed a potential pro-bowler in Lewis(he made it in the past), but for whatever reason, forgot how to play pass coverage and tackle last year, to the point where he couldn’t even get on the field on kickoff coverage. So maybe last year was just a blip on the radar, but lordy was he bad.

…and still better than our existing defensive backfield. :smack: :frowning:

My team, the Packers, haven’t done much yet, and I really don’t anticipate them making any big moves. Ted Thompson isn’t known for making big moves in free agency. Last year, they made some great moves (Pickett and Woodson) and some not so great moves (Manuel was a bust), but even though they have a lot of money under the cap, they’re probably not going to make any big moves. They’ll probably lose Ahman Green, and they did sign Jenkins who made some serious improvement last year.

Word on the street is that they’re talking about trading for Randy Moss. While it would significantly improve their talent level, I hate him and don’t want him in a Packer uniform.

Other than that, I see your 49ers also got Ashley Lelie. Good luck with that.

One thing I forgot. I hear the Dolphins are shopping Randy McMichael. I think he’d be a welcome addition.

Where’d you hear a definite on that?
I wanted Lelie on my team since he was in college, but the same could be said by my mother about J.J. Stokes.

Browns. Signed Eric Steinbach. Was a huge need, because Joe Andruzzi’s knees retired 2 years ago and yet he’s somehow made it onto the field. Paid too much though - biggest guard contract in history, and I’m not too happy about it. Didn’t overpay nearly as much as the Niners did for Clements, which was insane. Would’ve preferred drafting a top guard in round 2 for 1/10th the price.

Also signed Peek - forget his first name, OLB/DE from the Texans. Not very good as a 4-3 DE, but apparently showed a lot of promise as a 3-4 OLB, and I’d sure like to see him take over for Paycheck McGinest after he hurts his man-boob stretching before the first pre-season game.

My team is the Lions.

I’m so lost. I’m down with trading Bly for Bell, a 5th rounder, and a tackle. I didn’t know why we traded James Hall (for a 4th rounder). Then I hear on Sports Illustrated’s website that the Lions are targeting Brady Quinn.

Christ.

Listen, I just want Shaun Springs (I’m NOT happy going into the season with Fernando Bryant as my number one corner). Maybe Ed Hartwell? I see drafting a cornerback or two in my future. I’d like to trade down and get one of the top three defensive linemen and pair them up with the “rotation” as it exists now.

Chris Leak in the third would be nice, too. I need to take over Matt Millen’s job. I’ve called these drafts close to perfectly the past three years.

I saw that on ESPN.

My Bills lost Clements, which I was unhappy about, but the 49ers threw a crazy deal at him and there’s not much you can do about it. For now, I’m really hoping they draft Okoye out of Louisville.

It’s appearing as though my Seahawks got caught with their pants down.

Needed a starting LG. All three impact free agents are already signed (two of which for at least what we would have given Hutchinson last year had we not gotten screwed on the contract situation).
Wanted to move Darrell Jackson…nothing yet and with every WR that is signed the market dries up that much more.
Still have Ken Hamlin out there shopping himself around.

Even better…we don’t have a pick until the middle of the second round due to the Deon Branch trade.

Yeah, I keep up a lot with the offseason, and it almost seemed like a given that Dielman was going to Seattle. It was clear to everyone that they wanted him badly and weren’t going to let him leave until a deal was done. No one expected him to re-sign to what must be a much cheaper contract. I don’t know if he had a change of heart, or if he planned to stay all along and just wanted to see what he was worth.

There were rumors that Seattle lowballed him compared to what the other guards signed for, which is possibly, because Dockery and Steinbach got way overpriced contracts, although Steinbach’s was more justified than Dockery’s.

Redskins fan here.

This might actually be the first time in a long while that Snyder doesn’t attempt to win the offseason. They signed London Fletcher and reacquired Fred Smoot (they really wanted Nate Clements, but who didn’t). Not bad, addressing a few needs. But we lost Derrick Dockery, which I find a little frustrating. I thought they were all about keeping the o-line together.

My Saints have released WR Joe Horn–they say the door is open for him to return, but he wanted to test the market. I suspect someone will pay him enough to leave. Hate to see him go, but he is 35 years old, and I think Colston is ready to step up into the number 1 receiver slot…if Colston can stay healthy.

We also resigned DT Hollis Thomas and TE Billy Miller.

Saints have to get better at CB, could use a linebacker. Would love to see them trade up in the draft to take Patrick Willis from Ole Miss…

I was disappointed to see that the Steelers had let Joey Porter go. They said he was a victim of the salary cap and this is not a statement that Mike Tomlin is cleaning house of Cower’s boys. Regardless, I think we’ll feel the loss.

Hmmm, let’s see, what about my Bears

Coming off that Super Bowl loss everything went all pear-shaped.

We got into a pissing match with Lovie Smith. Mind you, I’m not one who thinks Lovie is indispensable. His players love him and play hard for him which is no small feat, however I found myself questioning his decision making numerous time during the season and I never felt like we won games with a gameplan, instead we simply were more talented. Again, he probably deserves some credit for finding and coaching players who can play at a superior level but just once I’d have liked to feel that my coach could draw up a play in the dirt and/or make a gutsy call which would turn the tide in a game. Often our coordinators seemed to be making wrong-minded choices which Lovie never seemed to overrule. We rarely if ever made game-changing adjustments at halftime. So, I suppose on balance keeping Lovie was a victory, but I don’t think that all the drama around it was warranted. I hope the animosity it created didn’t spill into the locker room and I hope Lovie doesn’t see it as a justification that his current way of doing things is ideal.

We lost Ron Rivera, which I think will probably be worse for morale than it will anything else. The players liked him and played extremely hard for him on defense. It’s very difficult to know how much of the defenses success was Lovie’s doing and how much was Rivera’s. And really that’s the issue with his leaving the team. You probably don’t want to lose your Defensive Coordinator when your defense practically carries you to the Super Bowl but we never used the schemes which he was educated in, namely the Buddy Ryan/Jim Johnson aggressive blitzing style, and that leads me to believe his impact was minimal. I would have loved to see Lovie and Rivera find a way to blend the Tampa-2 and the Eagles attacking style into some crazy Frankenstein monster but it never happened. They played almost exclusively a bend but don’t break cover-2. As a result we never really dominated against the run and were susceptible to accurate QBs who could exploit the middle of the field. This style was successful when we had pro-bowl caliber talent at just about every position but when a few key injuries popped up I didn’t feel like the coaching staff was able to compensate and adjust. That to me was an indictment of the coaching staff. Long story short, I’m not heart broken about Rivera’s loss. Let’s hope he was part of the problem and not a solution holding together a even more flawed system. Time will tell.

It’s not a change, but since I’m discussing the coaching I should mention Ron Turner’s offense. He’s got to get better. I liked the plays he drew up and I liked his aggressiveness in the passing game, but he did a poor job of picking his spots. Throwing deep in poor conditions when Rex was struggling. Moving away from a successful running game, substituting the useless Cedric Benson in key moments. I feel like he knows how to exploit a defense and I feel like he and Rex Grossman can grow together but he needs to get a better sense of timing and has to take a larger view of teh game in his play calling. Of course, it’s Lovie’s job to veto bad plays and direct when to run and when to go deep, so perhaps these issues are more a Lovie issue than a Ron Turner issue.

As for player news in free agency, nothing major to report yet.

LB - Lance Briggs got franchised and isn’t happy about it. Still most indications are that a longer term deal might get done and he’s expected to be around for a while.

The next priority is retaining OG - Ruben Brown which by most accounts will happen. Solidifying those two positions should allow us the flexibility to draft the best talent available instead of reaching for needs.

The rest of the FAs are largely expendable. WR - Justin Gage is useless and FS - Todd Johnson is a fair backup and a great special teams contributor who I’m happy to have, but he’s played tons of minutes due to injury as a starter and has shown that he’s really not good enough to play full time in this system. If he’s cheap, they should probably keep him so long as he doesn’t take a roster spot that could be used on a safety with more upside.

DT - Alfonso Boone is the toughest choice I think. He is similar to Todd Johnson in that he’s a effective role player backing up and spelling the younger front line, he’s probably maxed out as a player so he’s is what he is. Big, gap clogging DTs are pretty rare so he’s more valuable than Todd Johnson but the Bears need a player who can shed blocks better and play faster at the point of attack to work in with Tank Johnson and Tommie Harris. For a huge run stuffer, he doesn’t make enough tackles in the run game. He eats blocks well, but can’t shed and wrap up ball carriers. The Bears defense is best when teams are forced to run off tackle which lets them use the elite team speed. So, I would like to see an upgrade at this position and a younger player who can develop would be preferred but if that’s unlikely Boone is still an asset if the price is right.

DT - Ian Scott is nearly a carbon copy of Boone and falls under the same rationale. Scott is however younger and more athletic and has the potential to improve against the run and develop into a more reliable role player. For that reason, given a choice, I’ll retain him and let Boone go. Still, I don’t know that either player is worth paying a premium for.

The Bears have a few important needs to address in free agency. Historically they have relied on the draft to bolster their depth but there are a few players available in the market who would be ideal fits.

RB - Michael Turner tops my list of desires. He’s a local guy who would probably be thrilled to come to Chicago and he’s got that speed and receiving ability that the already solid Bears backfield sorely needs. Thomas Jones has been great and as an everydown back he’s been terrific but he just doesn’t have that break away speed. There were too many occasions this season where the O-line opened up a huge hole and Jones only managed a 8 or 10 yard gain, a back with additional speed would have made it to the third level and threatened to go to the house. Speed out of this position would make an already good running game flat out dominant. Also, Turner would immediately become the best receiver out of the backfield for us which, assuming Rex and Ron Turner can learn to use it, would become an ideal security blanket for the QB position. The system’s propensity for the deep ball would make those swing routes very productive at moving the chains. I fear that the investment the team has in Cedric Benson (not to mention Jones’ tendency to get bitchy when he feels slighted) will make it unlikely that they’ll make an aggressive move like this. They may choose to settle for a good current running attack instead of striving for great. Turner would open up so many options beyond just rushing yards, it would turn a somewhat predictable offense into one that comes at you from all angles.

FS - Ken Hamlin would fill a needs the Bears have without breaking the bank. Every year in recent memory the Bears have augmented their secondary through the draft and they have a knack for location talent this way, however they tend to expend mutilple draft picks on the position. It’s a primary reason why their special teams are so good. Still, often it feels that the sacrifice depth at other positions in doing so. When healthy our secondary is one of the very best, but our Safeties are notoriously fragile. Mike Brown is simply the best in the league but he’s has season ending injuries for 3 straight years and our backups simply don’t have the talent to replace him. I like Hamlin’s ability to play both the free and strong safety positions and he’s a perfect fit in the cover-2. He tackles very well, plays well in run support and pairs well with Mike Brown. Hamlin has been very durable and I feel like he could take the place of a pair of DBs and put Chris Harris and Danieal Manning into backup/nickel roles which they are better suited for. There’s a fairly rich market out there for Free Safeties this offseason so hopefully the Bears could land this guy without overpaying. With a team as good as the Bears I think adding experienced talent can be what pushes them over the top.

Assuming they fortify those two needs they can focus their draft on adding Linebacker depth and O-line depth. Both are likely to be good values at the end of the first round. I’m not sold on Pozlusny which is the popular rumor, but I think they have the flexibility to go for the best talent available. Offensive Tackle and Guard would both be shrewd additions for the future as well as a Defensive Tackle with size. Under utilized positions like TE and FB would be good targets for later rounds.

I really want to get Michael Turner. With so many more seasoned RBs on the market like McGahee, Dillon. Rhodes, Henry and Ahman Green, Turner might just be affordable and as a Restricted Free Agent the Bears might be one of the few teams willing to part with a draft pick to get the job done.

I haven’t seen him too much, and I do think he’s underrated, but I’d say top 5 rather than top one. But you do know your team well.

For what it’s worth, in the Tampa 2, the roles of free and strong safety pretty muh dissapear, and you think more in terms of simply left and right safety.

Corey Dillon retired. The UFA market being fairly well stocked might not have any bearing unless SD really wants to get rid of him for any value they can. Otherwise they’re unlikely to lower their price on a trade (and he’s already got the 1st and 3rd round tender as a UFA, IIRC) because of the market.

Really, I think it’s Mike Brown, Ed Reed, Troy Polamalu and Bob Sanders in that elite group. All are great, and valid arguments can be made for all of them. When healthy I’ll take Mike Brown over the rest because of his ability to both ball hawk and be a lights out run stopper. Of course it’s entirely subjective, so I don’t expect everyone to agree.

Generally this is true but in the Bears scheme, and some others, the safeties flip to the weak and strong side based one where the slot WR lines up. I think they prefer to do this because it frees Brown up to blitz and and run support which he’s best at. Also the Bears Strong Safeties have tended to be converted Corners because of the occasional need to cover man-to-man. I like Hamlin because he can blitz and run support like Brown as well as cover which would allow them to be more interchangeable and play halves like you describe. As it is, where Brown lines up is a bit of a tip off to QBs and they can try and run away from him. Hamlin would lessen the burden on him to always play near the line and blitz.

Not necessarily true. He originally made that statement, or his agent did depending on who you believe, but quickly backed off of it and most indications are that he’ll be playing somewhere this year so long as he’s promised the feature back role with presumably a contender. Certainly retirement is a fall back plan, but he’s technically on the market at the moment unless I missed a more recent announcement.

Regarding Michael Turner, I hadn’t seen that they’d tendered him so that does make it quite the long shot. Still, holding the 31st pick makes the 1st and 3rd rounder price tag a little bit easier to swallow. Frankly, I think it’d be worth that to get him because he could become the perfect 1-2 punch with Benson for a few years down the road.

Giants fan here:

So far we have released both Emmons and Arrington. I must say that I was somewhat frustrated but not very upset to see Arrington go. A lot of people (myself included) were excited for the potential of the Giants Linebacker core. Unfortunately, we were marred with injuries.

We need defensive backs that can actually defend against the pass but I have given up hope on that.

Shaun O’Hara resigned to a 5-year deal, which is nice because it provides some stability in a position that is somewhat thin since Petitgout was cut.

I know nothing about Strahan right now.

Hopefully Hal Briston will be in here later to fill in the many holes I left.

Considering the insane money that they’d have had to match to keep Doc, be grateful that they let him go - it was the wise move. He’s a serviceable guard, but he’ll never make you forget Russ Grimm.

Depth is a problem, though, throughout much of the roster.