Yes but not recently. The original charges date back to 2020 (although there are additional charges after his seizure by US troops) :
I see, thanks.
Was his arrest even legal? Was there a warrant for his arrest? Was he read his Miranda Rights? If his arrest was illegal, shouldn’t he be released before there is even a trial?
A fair question. According to this NPR article:
It’s worth mentioning that she’s Colombian [ETA: though, with a Cuban exile mother, maybe all bets are off].
Maybe this one … they don’t have 100% confidence in her blindly doing DJT’s bidding.
Maybe.
Isn’t Maduro still President of Venezuela under Venezuelan law as interpreted by authorities currentlyin power? If so he’s just incapacitated; there’s no vacancy. Rodriguez is only acting president. So in theory as long as he’s acquitted before his term ends and Venezuela doesn’t have another revolution or coup he’d be able to resume office.
I think the charges cited in the article you linked to are amusing:
The charges include “narco-terrorism” conspiracy, cocaine importation conspiracy, possession of machine guns and destructive devices and conspiracy to possess machine guns and destructive devices against the US. (bolding mine)
By that argument, they should issue an arrest warrant against other people too.
The Maduro and Noriega cases are going to have overwhelming similarities. Same criminal charges, both heads of state, both capture by US military inside their home country; both faced drug cartel/conspiracy charges.
As I’ve said numerous times, there was/will be a threshold question of whether there was an armed conflict. Reading up on Maduro’s capture, there was - but I was also say it was limited to that quick invasion and is probably over. So, Maduro is a POW and entitled to Geneva protections (on top of his constitutional defendant rights). This part gets fun, and complicated, being both a current POW / criminal defendant for past conduct, at the same time.
For the record, Noriega never stopped being a POW and getting Geneva protections. Not until the US finally released him from custody, dressed back in full military uniform, in 2011.
With that in mind, and Trump’s view of the much broader drug boat strikes / war on drugs as an armed conflict already, if Maduro is acquitted he is still a POW subjected to detention until the end of hostilities. If you think a war on cocaine that allow boat strikes is a war crime (ie, an armed conflict) then Maduro, as cartel boss involved in that, can be detained as a POW until that conflict is over.
This is why we need to be careful what we call war crimes since it must mean armed conflict which then gives legit rise to detention powers. There is nothing that indicates this “drug war” needs to be limited to just Venezuela. If you think the whole conspiracy of splitting up the world and “the US gets the America hemisphere”, this is how they could go about doing that.
An interesting theory I saw floated on social media (I know, I know), is that if this case doesn’t draw a MAGA judge, or if things otherwise appear to be headed off the rails, DoJ will offer to drop charges in exchange for Maduro “confessing” to helping rig the 2020 election. (You may recall there’s a conspiracy theory about Venezuela somehow rigging voting machines to cost Trump the election).
So even if the prosecution doesn’t work out, Trump can still pull out a valuable and face-saving outcome.
This is going to be a big part of this case. Generally, it is well settled, that a foreign head of state has immunity to arrest for US crimes. That should apply to Maduro.
In the Noriega case, he was also a head of state arrest for drug trafficking. As head of state, he should have been immune to arrest/prosecution. However, the US Courts deferred to the Executive branch who claimed he was not the valid head of state of Panama. Only the the Executive branches take on who was the valid head of state mattered.
Here, I’d guess they will (need to) say Maduro is not the valid head of state. There’s some truth to that. Except, they seem pretty certain that vice-president Rodriguez is the new President. That kind of undercuts the claim of her being legit but Maduro being illegitimate when they got to power the same way. Seems like Trump would need Rodriguez to get re-elected properly or something. I’d watch to see what they refer to her as in the interim.
While I don’t agree with the way Maduro was captured, the charges are very real and well documented. Trump will bumble it all up though, since charges are not really the point.
But it would still be seriously damaging to Trump if he did get off while he was still president (in as much as anything can be damaging to him). Of course the media will talking about the next Trump scandal by then. Who has time to report on Maduro getting off when AOC was just sent to Guantanamo?
Is it absolutely guaranteed that he will be tried in New York and that, if so, he will be be tried before a jury and not just a judge?
By his VP maybe, but definitely not by the Venezuelan people.
Judge Alvin Hellerstein of the SDNY is overseeing Maduro’s arraignment and will likely preside over the case. He’s 92 years old and doesn’t give a shit what anyone thinks about him.
There are enough supporters of the regime to make it seem like he’s being welcomed as a hero. And I’m sure actually doing one over on trump, would increase his standing (though not enough to overcome the stuff that made him unpopular to begin with like the economy being in the toilet, etc)
Even if he wasn’t popular before, he probably is now. Trump has done wonders for legitimizing his regime in the eyes of his people.
He could only be tried by a judge alone if he agreed to it (I don’t know if it would be an option at all for a major felony trial, whether he wanted it or not). It seems pretty unlikely he would ever agree to it. A New York City jury would always be the best bet for the defence, in these circumstances, I think?
Also AFAiK the prosecution could not move the trial because they thought the NYC jury pool was prejudiced, only the defense can ask for that? But IANAL
Two legal theories I’ve seen that the government could use to establish venue in SDNY:
- Maduro likely engaged the services of at least one Manhattan-based financial institution in furtherance of his alleged crimes.
- Maduro was flown into Stewart Airport in New Windsor, NY, which is within the SDNY’s jurisdiction (the “port of entry” argument).
Sure, the government could justify a venue of SDNY. The question isn’t how, it’s why. The government clearly wants a conviction here, and SDNY is less likely to deliver a conviction than many other courts. Surely they could find justification for some other venue, where the jury would not consist of New Yorkers?
It’s not like they could convince him to give up his right to trial by jury, right?