What happens if there is no one in the Presidential Line of Succession?
Possible hypothetical examples:
During the State of the Union, someone bombs the capitol and assassinates the designated survivor.
During the inauguration, someone kills both the president and vice-president elect, along with the Speaker of the House and the Presdient Pro Temp of the Senate, and none of the new President’s cabinet officials have been confirmed yet.
I know that there is no provision for this in the Constitution, but might there be a law covering it somewhere in the US Code? And, if not, what, realistically, would happen?
No, they all, but one, resign prior to the inauguration. Some have already resigned.
IIRC, there is one member of the Obama cabinet who does not resign prior to the inauguration. Under presidential succession, they become the president (designated survivor) if everyone else within the new administration and Congress bite the dust.
Incoming presidents will sometimes ask current cabinet officials to stay on for a while in order to aid the transition. For example, Obama asked Robert Gates to continue as Sec Def after Bush’s term, and he ended up staying well into Obama’s first term.
But Trump has been…rather hostile towards Obama’s political appointees, and it’s unlikely any of them have been asked to hang around.
I assume if the entire house, senate, and cabinet is toast, then at least the governors can appoint senators immediately. Not sure what happens to the house, it could take a while (according to Designated Survivor) to hold new house elections.
So what’s the order of succession? 3rd is president Pro Tempore of the Senate, so I guess the question is how fast could the new senators elect one?
Due to a quirk in the Senate rules, one Senator can constitute a quorum if nobody asks for a quorum call. (See NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD v. NOEL CANNING ET AL., (2014).) So all you have to do is ask the governor of Virginia (or another nearby state) to appoint a Senator, have the Senator gavel the Senate into session, and have himself elected President Pro Tempore by unanimous consent.
I was just talking to a coworker about this today. If a tragedy were to kill everyone at the inauguration and no existing (carried over to the new Administration from the old) Cabinet members or elected succession folks survived, the highest eligible non-political official at State would become President. That official is Under-Secretary for Political Affairs, Tom Shannon.
One ficitonal nuclear war story that I read said the presidential order of succession had the governors of the states next in line for succession if all those in the regular line succession were dead. You’d start with the governor of Delaware and then go down the list to Hawaii. While this was a work of fiction, it’s actually a very reasonable method to use.
Would this effectively mean that the governor who was physically closest to the capital building would appoint himself as Senator and thus President.
What happens if Washington DC is physically destroyed (which I have to think is fairly likely in the given hypothetical where everyone in the Federal government is dead). Where does the newly appointed Senator call the Senate into session?
Also, do the Senate rules persist a period with no Senators? My understanding was that the House starts over with a clean slate because it’s an entirely new House, but the Senate keeps its rules around because the Senate is a continuation of the previous body. That wouldn’t be true any more in this scenario either.
In contrast, Representatives must be elected; they can’t be appointed.
This means that most of the Federal government can be reconstituted by appointment and succession. Governors can appoint Senators, who can elect a President pro tem who then becomes President. The new president can appoint new Cabinet members, who would be confirmed by the Senate.
However, accession of a new Vice President would have to await the election of a new House, since the VP has to be confirmed by both houses, not just the Senate.
I hadn’t thought of that. I like the way your mind works.
Good question. Don’t know.
Don’t really know, but I would like to point out that just because the original justification for a practice/law/rule no longer applies, that doesn’t mean that the practice/law/rule no longer applies.