not a mistake but it takes you out of the movie

Here are a few of my movie peeves which y’all have graciously reminded me of in this thread:

When the soundtrack gets so loud that you can’t hear the dialogue. A total distraction, obviously. Kenneth Branagh is notorious for this. In Hamlet, for example, I could barely make out what the ghost and Hamlet were saying in their dramatic first meeting – not a good strategy to drown out the dialogue in a story where the language is antiquated and the audience is already probably struggling to understand what’s being said.

The not saying goodbye on the phone – or not giving the person on the other end of the line enough time to say what it is they’re probably saying – is a problem for me. We have a training video at work that I have to watch monthly for a course I teach. The acting is awful, granted, but the scene where the phone rings, the boss picks up without saying a word, listens for a few seconds, nods, and then puts the receiver back down without ever acknowledging the person on the other end of the line just drives me nuts. I mean COME ON, PEOPLE! I can live with a half-assed effort for this kind of production, but a no-assed effort?!?

I’m another one who gets very annoyed that every time someone gets in front of a computer, they immediately begin clacking away on the keyboard and never, ever mouse around. Who does this? I recognize that this has become a standard film convention to indicate that the computer user is furiously working at their machine, but we’re a generation into computers with mice – maybe it’s time to revise the convention.

Cinematography can often take me right out of the movie. The current love of shaky cam – for that *cinema verite *feel – just pisses me off. My eyes don’t jiggle when I’m running around, so why the hell should the camera? I recall that there is one scene in Carlito’s Way – ONE SCENE – that was shot in steady cam, while the rest was shot normally. Obviously it was done that way for a reason, but I then spent the next ten minutes deconstructing the filming technique in my head instead of just enjoying the movie which ruined the show for me.

Product placement can be a serious distraction. I’ll jump onto the hating on Goldeneye bandwagon and say that the BMW in that movie was 1000% superfluous. I mean, we get a detailed description of all the car’s gadgets when Bond gets it, which is a clear Bond movie signal that a chase scene is imminent and it will require all the gadgets to be used. And then… nothing. Bond drives around the countryside in his spiffy new Beemer, then hands it over to what’s his name, the CIA guy, and we never see the car again. WTF was that, aside from an unusually shameless plug for the car? Now, admittedly, that movie lost me before the opening credits, but that was just one more straw on that camel’s broken back.

As for nudity, hey, I’m all for gratuitous nudity. When I get pulled out of the movie is when necessary nudity gets fudged, as with the previously noted strippers at work but not getting naked, or Katherine Heigl doing several nasty sex scenes with her undies on or the sheet over the woman’s chest but not the man’s. But the worst one for me was in Beowulf, where our hero decides to fight Grendel in the nude (kinky!), but then the film makers go to heroic lengths to hide Beowulf’s weiner behind carefully placed furniture, candelabras, etc. It turned what shoud have been a big, dramatic scene into a complete farce. All I could think of for the entire scene was the “Son of the Invisible Man” scene from Amazon Women On The Moon. Not exactly the mood I think they were aiming for. I mean, if you’re gonna have your hero strip down completely and parade around naked for the next 15 minutes, then fucking have him naked! Don’t then turn around and obsess over hiding his shame. That’s just stupid. If you’re so afraid of having a penis on screen, then have him in a loincloth or something.

I’m sure I’ll think of more later, but these are a few biggies for me.

Most things involving digital images/photo enhancement tick me off. I’ve been making personal use of Photoshop for at least a decade and worked for over two years processing images at a digital library, so I have some experience in this area. People on TV and in movies (especially CSI type shows) regularly do things with one mouse click that would actually involve several steps, or that aren’t even possible.

A typical scene goes something like this:

IMAGE EXPERT: Here’s an image we took from the security camera showing a blurry image of the perp, from behind.
ME: “Enhance it!”
COP: Enhance it.
ME: <drinks>
IMAGE EXPERT: <mouseclick> And here we see a crystal clear close-up of the perp’s face.

Even worse is when someone actually has to design a digital model of an object. “Here’s a black-on-white line drawing of the spaceship, now <click> I’ve turned it into a 3D rotating green-on-black polygon mesh image, and now <click> it’s in full color with a realistic metal texture and is shooting little animated rockets at the Earth.”

I’ve seen this mentioned here in CS before, but although this probably was an unintentional anachronism on the part of the writers, it doesn’t bother me because “stalking” is a hunting term. That '70s Show was set in a small town in Wisconsin. I lived in Wisconsin for several years, and even in Madison in the '90s deer hunting was a very big deal. All the characters on the show would have been familiar with the word “stalking” as meaning “to stealthily follow”.

“Everybody” does not know any such things. I’d probably have cut off the toes as well, because it would be easier and more comfortable, and cutting off the heels would mean I’d always have to be worried about the shoes coming off.

When I got my first training bra I wore it to bed several times because television had given me the mistaken impression that this was what women did. It’s pretty uncomfortable. I quickly abandoned the practice, but I think it was several years before I realized that hardly anyone wears a bra to bed.

I can’t stand it when actresses in period pieces (notably, the Victorian era) wear their hair down around their shoulders. Anyone who has ever read the Anne of Green Gables books or Little Women can tell you that finally being allowed to wear your hair up was a big honking deal for girls in the 1800s, and no grown-ass woman would be seen whimsically cavorting about town with her hair loose. Drives me batty.

(I’ll grant an exception to anyone playing Cathy in Wuthering Heights, because Cathy was supposed to be an unruly, nearly-wild young woman who didn’t give a toss for what society would think of her before she got married. Everyone else who is supposed to be the least bit civilized had best pin up her hair.)

In the TV show Seventh Heaven (no really, I hardly ever watched it) whoever did the sound effects went way overboard with the footsteps. No matter who was walking or where you could hear every clip clop like they were horses walking around in tap shoes.

In Mad About You when what’s-her-name was pregnant they seemed to have taken a completely round ball and stuck it up her shirt. It was completely fake-looking.

Women in many shows/movies who get out of bed right after having sex and they have on their bras. Who has sex with a bra on? Or puts it back on before climbing out of bed?

Post-sex, one of them gets out of bed but somehow manages to pull off the entire top sheet and wrap it around themself–meanwhile the other person is still under the top sheet. Where did the extra sheet come from?

Some of these were mentioned before, but here are mine:

– When the Americans are fighting the Ruskies and the Russians have repainted American weapons that are s’posed to be theirs. Examples include Top Gun, whichever Iron Eagle had the F-4’s, The Fourth War.

– Obviously empty cups that are used as props. It doesn’t have to be scalding, but would it kill them to put coffee in the styrofoam cup?

– When someone’s watching a TV or monitor and it’s the same exact scene that we just saw earlier, with the camera cuts and different angles and everything.

– This is another specific example, but in Superman Returns, the bank robbers mounted a minigun to the roof of the building for no other purpose at all except to prove that Superman is bulletproof.

I’m confused by this one. Is it just because you don’t like smoking? Or do you think that someone couldn’t alternately sing and smoke?

I don’t mind this so much, because there’s not really a good way around it. Were the producers supposed to call the Soviet Air Force and say “we’re making a movie where we kick your ass. Can we borrow a couple MiG-23s?”

What did bother me is that in Top Gun they painted the faux-Russian planes gloss black. They may be the bad guys, but they’re not stupid. They’ve heard of camouflage.

In Top Gun’s defense, the US Navy does in fact use F-5s (the jets used to portray the MiG-28 in the movie) as aggressors in combat training, having them imitate Eastern Bloc fighters. I don’t think the F-5 ever had much of a career in the US Military doing anything but pretending to be a MiG, in fact.

Also, in response to Little Nemo, Iron Eagle II was the movie that had the F-4 Phantoms imitating MiGs. The first Iron Eagle movie had, IIRC, Mirage fighter jets imitating MiG-23s. Both movies were made using Israeli Defense Forces aircraft to portray American, Russian, and Generic Mustache Twirling Middle Eastern aircraft (the first movie also had AH-1 Cobras in the bad guys’ arsenal).

They could’ve used A-4 skyhawks (shot closer to make them look bigger) or maybe loaned a couple of Tornadoes from the RAF.

(missed the edit)
Also, guys speaking Spanish with either a completely wrong accent (mostly, Mexican accent) or those who are Hispanic but for whom Spanish is clearly a second language which they speak without fluency.
We also don’t all eat tacos in Larin America.
“Vaya con Dios” is completely dated (and “Dios” is one syllable with the stress on the “o”, not DEE-ohs"
“Mi casa es su casa”, I’ve only heard it in American movies.

Using A-4 Skyhawks would be distracting in Top Gun since the same movie features them being used by the US Navy for aggressor training (though they could have switched them out for the F-5s…)

For a great example of a bad Spanish/Mexican accent, watch Once Upon A Time In Mexico, which had Willem Dafoe playing a Mexican drug lord who would speak English with a cheezy Mexican accent, then speak Spanish with an authentic Wilem Dafoe accent.

It’s still the same problem. Anybody who knows fighter aircraft can tell the western-bloc from the eastern-bloc. And A-4s were out because that’s what they were using for the aggressor squadron within the Top Gun school. People might recognize the same plane as the pretend real-Russians and the pretend pretend-Russians.

I thought they used both the F-5s and A-4s as aggressors at Top Gun? I figured they used the F-5s as MiGs because they’re the more threatening-looking of the two planes. Kinda like why the Lockheed Joint Strike Fighter went into production instead of the Boeing design. Both performed similarly, but the Boeing one is funny looking.

That is so no true! It is also there to reset the scene from X-Man II where Pyro blows up those cop cars in front of Iceman’s parents’ house. C’mon, Bryan Singer, it’s sloppy (and lazy) to do homages to your own work, especially when the movies are only a couple years apart. :smiley:

As I recall, the minigun scene wasn’t originally in the movie, but was stuck in after some studio execs watched the first cut and realized that it was totally devoid of action. So it really was there for no other reason than to be there and shoot at Superman.

Top Gun was fine. Nothing in the movie said they were fighting Russians. IIRC, it just said that they were fighting “unfriendlies.” Granted, said unfriendlies would probably have Warsaw Pact weaponry, but you can’t be positive of that. We sold F-5s to all sorts of countries. Who’s to say they didn’t use them against Maverick?

Hell, one country we do horribly at getting along well with flies F-14 Tomcats. Maverick could have concievably found himself going up against… MIRROR MAVERICK!

Or something. Just an idea I’m bouncing around in my head for personal amusement.:cool:

I’d bet that Kcirevam would kick Maverick’s butt, too!

This reminds me - TV shows that talk about God all the time, but never mention Jesus. I mean, 7th Heaven is about a Christian preacher, his daughter becomes a preacher too, and yet, while they often mention The big Guy, I can’t recall once where JC is mentioned. Maybe it’s just the way I’ve skimmed episodes?

Touched By An Angel was another big offender - I mean, you have angels, and even the Devil, but no mention of Jesus? It’s not like they were pushing Judaism or Islam in these shows.