I didn’t say they were unnecessary, I said that they were inconvenient. Take your example of the Reformation: could it not be argued that, among the many other sociopolitical facets of that movement, there was a miscommunication regarding the meanings of words, as one side read/employed them as opposed to the other?
Totenfeier: I still dunno. Okay, words aren’t perfect, and we spend a lot of time mushing around with loose connotations… But words can accomplish a hell of a lot, and they have remarkable communicative power.
Since nothing in the world has ever been devised that does the job better, it seems strange to condemn the medium.
A mind-reading society might make the claim with a real reason, but what reason do we have? We’ve built a global high-tech civilization with words: how cool is that?