Elon Musk (@elon_musk__987 ; 177 followers ; Joined April 2024) followed me today. I’m not sure what the point of this (fan-based? automated?) account is, but so far it is definitely right-wing and pro-Elon.
On Twitter or BlueSky? The link mentions the latter, but it sure looks like a Twitter scammer.
If on Twitter, I’d probably report it, after calling them out for a bit. It very much seems to be making itself out to be the real Elon, but we know his own account. And that would be a legitimate indication of impersonation.
(Putting the check in the pic is pretty obviously scamming. That would be something I’d have Twitter scan for automatically.)
It’s on twitter. I link to Bluesky here because it renders pics fairly well. Also some people don’t like to click twitter links.
I’m not sure what the scammer thinks he’s up to. The timeline looks like a fan account at present.
MI’s SecState is opening an investigation.
An investigation that will probably be completed a month or two after Trump is inaugurated.
So, this was brought up by @N9IWP in the breaking news thread, but I dare not respond to it there, because, well, the hate and spittle are rightly discouraged there.
FFS - yeah, we always knew Musk’s “free speech absolutism” was for him and no one else, but once again the hypocrisy makes me sick.
But the other reason I mention it is that it ties in so nicely with Gym Jordan’s government fueled investigation into GARM along with Elon’s fucking help.
The fig leaf of fucking deniability is long gone, if we’re going to point fingers of collusion between Media and Government, I think it points much more strongly at Musk and the Republicans than it does anywhere else.
Sorry. I’m angry, and ranting, I’ll go away and have a drink. 
Oops. Accidental double post. See here:
What happened to his Go Fuck Yourselfbravado?
He makes me sick. He better lose that damn suit.
I honestly don’t see how he can win it. What’s next, he sues the rest of us for not visiting Twitter?
Mr. Show did a sketch just like that, where some movie studio ran focus studies and found that people loved the idea of saving money with coupons, and research suggested that it would be a huge hit to make a movie about it. And the movie tanked. So the studio sued the public for misleading the studio and won, and the judge sentenced everyone to see the movie.
More from Elmo’s ex-daughter;
The “weird 14-words breeder shit” is particularly on point, vicious, and deserved.
“P.S. Happy Father’s Day!”
Man, that was savage!
On very little reading, the lawsuit seems to be based on the theory that all of the advertisers have formed a cartel to get people to not purchase their product, which I guess may be a cause for action?
Unless Twitter has smoking gun emails, the defense of many companies independently deciding to not advertise on a platform that forces them to look like they support abhorrent ideas seems pretty easy to support.
Even if they were working together, how is organizing a boycott not legal?
IANAL, so not sure. I’m guessing maybe restraint of trade? We don’t allow companies to conspire together to set prices, so conspiring to not purchase from a corporation is not to much of a stretch.
The hard bit is going to be showing the conspiracy, when there was a lot of public pressure on companies to do what they actually did (stop advertising).
I would think they would all individually have the right not to advertise on a particular site. If this “cartel” were actively blocking others (say, key suppliers) from also advertising there, we’d start to approach an argument. But even that would be a stretch.
Don’t naturalized Americans take a citizenship test? Maybe Elmo’s parents bought it for him instead? Or maybe he got the idea that the more money you have the more important the ‘free’ speech?
The judge should kick this phony suit to the curb and fine Elmo double for being an unrepentant douchebag.
Up next: Elmo sues you, personally, for refusing to buy a cybertruck.