Now that Elon Musk has bought Twitter - now the Pit edition (Part 2)

Umm… is he completely wrong here? C-sections are a lot safer and more common now than they used to be, which means that many infants that would not have been born in the past are now delivered successfully. If one of the old reasons for failed births was big heads (albeit not necessarily large brains), doesn’t that mean that big-head genes are becoming somewhat more widespread among the population?

I don’t think “big head” necessarily correlates to “better brain.” Larger brain, perhaps. There used to be an argument that women weren’t as intelligent as men because their brains were smaller: I don’t think anyone believes that anymore—at least not anyone whose opinion on the subject should be taken seriously.

IIRC - Broadly speaking, a large brain at birth (relative to the brains of other species) was an evolutionary advantage for humans and is one reason while human childbirth is arduous and dangerous relative to other species.

However (and I think this is where Elon’s logic falls apart) while there are lots of reasons for a Caesarian birth, “this baby’s brain is just too damn big” is not one of them.

So, was Eloon delivered by C-section, birth canal, or dropped on his head? Does he insist on his spawn being delivered by C-section to preserve their big brains?

As I understood it, walking upright is the other constraint which puts limits on how wide a woman’s hips can be to accommodate that big head. If we were quadrupeds, the big head would be something that could be adapted to.

So does that make big booty fetishists geniuses? Asking for a friend.

Looks like we can add “constitutional monarchy” to the list of things Elmo doesn’t understand, because he’s now fixated on the idea that King Charles should unilaterally dissolve Parliament.

Yeah, his understanding of British government - or indeed of the particular issue he’s railing about - is on par with his understanding of most topics. Which is to say flawed to the point of delusion and largely composed of shallow right-wing propaganda.

OTOH, if Charles were to try and dismiss Parliament, I imagine the result would be that Parliament would dismiss him.

Thankfully for him, the UK abolished capital punishment in 1998, so his dismissal won’t go the same way his namesake’s did.

Whilst 1998 is technically correct (for some military crimes and treason), a more reasonable date for abolition is 1965 (1973 in Northern Ireland). The last execution was in 1964. Apologies for the hijack.

Arson in a Royal dockyard just isn’t as exciting as it used to be. Thanks Tony Blair!

Elmo’s underlying attitude comes through in everything he says and does. His bit about King Charles isn’t a sign of ignorance about modern UK governance.

Instead it’s simply another manifestation of his worldview. To wit:

    The world should be ruled by at most a handful of absolute dictators, be they evil or benign. And I, Elmo, will be the capo di tutti capi of them all. By divine right, superior DNA, and a complete absence of fluoride in my precious bodily fluids.

I’ll respect his name when he stops deadnaming his own daughter.

Give the man some credit.

His idea to send a submarine jury-rigged from spare parts lying around Space X, to save the Thai cave soccer team was merely deluded, with a large side of hubris.

No shallow right-wing propaganda there, just shallow self-promotion.

mmmmmm…steak.

“Not Elon Musk, definitely not” guy doesn’t understand Dune at all:

Obviously, Musk himself would never make such a fundamental error of thematic analysis, oh no not at all.

Elmo: When I was a kid everyone said I was a Mentat!
Tosca: No Elon, mental, we all said you were mental…
Kimbal: He’s such a dork.

Psst. Keep quiet. You remember Trump Steak? Lets’s not replay that travesty.

Oh, get Bbbbent.