My understanding on how things like onlyfans work is that you would actually put in a request for a specific act.
There are many reasons people pay for porn, not just for custom requests. I’d personally find that discussion interesting if someone wants to start a thread on it. But to avoid a hijack here, I’ll just note that there is a LOT of money spent on porn. It is a proven market, if Musk wants to pursue it.
But mainstream social media has a problem with it. Anyone remember Tumblr and their removal of pornography a few years ago? Here is an explanation from the CEO why the site isn’t going back:
I would totally pay for porn, but only if Musk performs in it. Not that I want to see Musk naked, but rather that I want to see him utterly debased.
Elton John has quit Twitter. Musk asked him to stay/return.
Well, there is that video of him doing that little ‘dance’.
Scraping up cash where they can:
From an industrial-sized pizza oven to a statue of the Twitter bird, here are all the weird things you can buy from Elon Musk’s Twitter fire sale…
Never mind; this isn’t the pit thread. Oops.
Wasn’t eBay one of the companies that got Musk where he is? Why would he be selling stuff on a competing auction site?
Ebay’s merger with Paypal was long after they fired Elmo.
Musk makes surprise appearance at Dave Chappelle performance in San Francisco and is booed
https://www.cnn.com/2022/12/12/tech/twitter-disbands-trust-and-safety-council/index.html
Final line may or may not be the cause of this event, but likely informed it:
Three members of the council resigned in protest last week, writing in a statement that “contrary to claims by Elon Musk, the safety and wellbeing of Twitter’s users are on the decline.”
So Musk disbanded it before it ceased to exist? Brilliant.
I’m having difficulty understanding the “twitter files” due to how differently the story is being reported on regular news versus the right-wing channels like Fox news.
Obviously, we all know the latter has a poor record of being honest about anything, but the frustrating thing is that the regular news isn’t disputing the claims of Fox, they are just talking past each other.
Fox et al are saying that the “Biden administration” pressured Twitter to bury stories about Hunter’s laptop.
Meanwhile regular news are saying it was the Biden campaign that requested that Twitter take down naked images of Hunter (which are against Twitter’s ToS anyway), not hide any stories.
So what about the laptop story? From what I can gather, some execs at Twitter thought the laptop story was so silly they put it behind a warning that you had to click through, and there’s no evidence linking this decision to the Biden campaign. Is that right?
I have taken it to mean that the right wing was pissed that private companies refused to re-print their lying propaganda, and want the government to force them to print lies.
Obviously, they weren’t hard-core. Taking the week-end off? Pfft.