Oh, I see. I’ve seen people do that before in their last gasps of an argument. I get it now.
Irony *is *a difficult concept for the unintelligent. Don’t feel bad.
Define sacred.
The rest has already been explained in this thread ad nauseam. I suggest you go back and read from the beginning.
Oh, I get it. Ad hominem is another good thing to try when your out of facts and reason. I admire your effort.
I have read it and it makes me weep for humanity. The gun nuts are a pathetic, ignorant, and fearful bunch. I honestly feel sorry for your lot, and wish that our education system hadn’t let you down so badly.
Dude. You (and your smilie) don’t get shit.
You’re the one that seems fearful of inanimate objects. Not sure why you are commenting on our education. I graduated summa cum laude, how about you?
No you don’t. The NRA offers beginning firearm classes where you can learn about guns and gun safety. That might help remove your fear.
Sorry. I was unduly annoyed by your apparent presumption that I was misleading you with weasel words like “can be” and omitting obvious conditions that would rule out the applicability of the doctrine. Your questions read less like sincere inquiries and more like rhetorical questions suggesting that obviously if the doctrine were just properly explained it would be shown not to apply. Such is the nature of reading tone on a message board, I suppose.
I’m sure **Ravenman **properly gauged your intent, unlike my intent-impaired self. 
I’m not afraid of inanimate objects. Neither do I worship them - like you and your pants-pissing cohorts do - to the point that I start crying when I hear one has been melted down.
But, that is their tool-value. The whole of it. What they were designed and made for.
Jack you seem to have a lot of hostility. I really think you should calm down and take one of those gun safety classes offered by the NRA.
Do you think we should outlaw bows and arrows too?
Let me get this straight. You think that the only reason that guns exist and that someone would own a gun is because they are “evil death dealing scary things”.
Do I have that right?
At the time it was called “with high honor” but I’m sure my program was much tougher and my university much more presigious than yours.
Not until somebody points out that this will ultimately lead to a virtual government monopoly on the secondary market for low-cost firearms, and the heads of every Republican in the country explode.
OK, so in today’s terms you would only be magna cum laude? Maybe you should have studied harder.
What does presigious mean?
Of course I meant prestigious you silly man. What was your major? Basketweaving? At an SEC school?
They could put them up on gunbroker.com, where they would think reach a fair market value. I suppose people would also realize they could take unwanted guns to a pawn shop to accomplish much the same thing. Maybe we just need more awareness of the latter.
I get it you were being ironic just like Jack was. I appreciate the humor.
I don’t like to give out too much information to strangers on the internet. But at least we can agree my GPA was higher than yours.
Boblibdem, did you know that liberal democrats are one of the fastest growing demographics for gun purchases?