Denmark lost forty-three soldiers in Afghanistan, 2002-2013 - the greatest loss of life per capita of any NATO country - and seven soldiers in Iraq, 2003-2007.
Used to be that if you sent your children to fight and die for your liege lord, at least you got a shiny little something in return. These days, not so much.
Why should the Iranians negotiate with a country that calls them an “Axis of Evil”? (And that was the least of it, the Trump cabinet position on Iran is even worse, but I haven’t been following them closely enough to pick up their catchphrases).
American politics for several decades has been full of exactly this kind of triumphalist rhetoric about our moral superiority to our opponents- “evil empire”, “axis of evil”, etc… Iranians aren’t any different.
But this thread was about Iran. Iran is not bombing USA or another western country. And Iran is not being bombed.
Yes there are bombings between Israel and Iranian allies in Syria and/or Lebanon. But Israel is not a western country, I hope we westerners do not let ourselves sucked in to another war in the Middle East.
Great! Then there is no reason not to negotiate with them. Unless you think global negotiations should not be undertaken if the country has people in it that say mean things about America?
At this point, the Iranian leadership would be foolish if they didn’t develop nuclear weaponry as soon as possible. The Europeans, Russia, and China can’t and won’t protect them from an American Republican administration, conservative Israelis and Saudis.
The smartest thing peace-loving Americans can do is donate their extra dollars to the Iranian weapons program.
Yeah, but if Iran gets nuclear weapons, they will immediately use them and then they themselves will become a sheet of glass in the desert. Makes perfect sense!
Depends on which party is in the White House. That is the real factor in deciding whether entering negotiations is being a savvy dealmaker or negotiating with terrorists.
Or, you know, they could stop exporting terror and stop persecuting their own people. For good measure, they could also stop chanting death to America and promising to wipe Israel off the map.
But no, that’s beyond the pale or something. So instead we should just hope that they develop niclear weapons so that they are perfectly safe to continue persecuting gay people, women, and apostates. Because that’s how you make a better world - by giving despicable tyrants weapons to protect their despicable tyranny. And of course, Saudi Arabia will need nukes, and therefore so will Syria and Egypt and…
Ah, what a wonderful progressive world, where the middle east is full of nuclear weapons and the persecution of gay people and women can continue without the threat of someone stopping it. Nobel prizes for everyone!
Iran poses no real threat to Israel, and both parties know it.
Repeating myself from earlier in this thread, its military budget is on par with Norway’s and it has no air force to speak of. Israel, meanwhile, has the finest pound-for-pound army and air force in the world, and dozens if not hundreds of nuclear weapons, not to mention the backing of the United States, far and away the mightiest country on the planet. In any all-out war between the two, be it nuclear or non-nuclear, Iran, not Israel, would be the one to face obliteration.
Some might say they might do it anyway. They’re “irrational,” these people say, they’re “suicidal.” But the thing is - they’re not, at least not according to the experts in both Israel and the USA: