It’s summer, it’s hot. As such, I have a lot of fans on to keep cool. But, I was wondering about something. Most of the fans I have have 3 blades, but a couple have 4 blades.
Does the number of blades make a difference as far as the movement of air goes? I can’t feel any difference. So, I’m wondering, is the number of blades just some arbitrary number that the fan manufacturers choose? Or is there actually some significance behind them?
I imagine one or two simply wouldn’t get the job done, so three works, but four may be more aesthetically pleasing. I would assume the a four-bladed fan would move more air (if it was spinning just as fast.)
This WAG has been brought to you by friedo.
This was answered in “The Last Word” from New Scientist.
For 3 or 4 blade “office” fans, the difference is negligible. But when you need to move large volumes of air, more blades are the way to go. But since they are noisier, they’re usually relegated to rooftops or other out-of-the-way places.
Jet engine turbine “fans” are a good example. You need high volume (and speed) air flow with little cavitation. So these fans have several dozen very skinny blades. As a result, they’re very noisy.
I once worked for a mining fan company in high school. He wanted me to write a computer program to do fan design calculations. But the physics was a little beyond my 11th-grade brain. He had volumes of books on the subject, full of graphs covered with curves.
five blades are the most stable. stability is very important in a ceiling fan. remote control is fun as well, hunter has remote control, no worries about the string thingy getting caught up in the motor or blades. things not getting caught up in the fan is very important as well, let me tell you.
if it is a floor fan there isn’t much diffrence between four and five blades. clip on types are good for spot cooling and drying, they are great for beside your chair or bed.