Typo or intentional?
Intentional. Whenever I hear or use the phrase I always revert to that for some reason.
Well, these folks are definitely using bread dough for brains when they decide to throw in with trump, so it seems an apt expression. 
And one I will be using going forward. Thank you. Your royalty check would be in the mail, but trump’s postmaster sorta put that business out to pasture.
"End of Bagel Distraction, as per What Exit?"
Well, having a load of bagels hitting you in the head would be kind of disorienting. “Was that a bagel? Is someone throwing them?!?”
So the timeline goes:
Oct 4: Forbes publishes its list of wealthiest assholes, sans Trump.
Oct 10: Trump goes off on Forbes for being globalist, communist, etc. He demands a full apology.
Oct 11: Forbes presumably discussed how best to apologize to Trump.
Oct 12: Forbes publishes its apology in the form of an article about a bunch of incriminating emails the NYAG didn’t have. Yet.
Oop.
End of Bagel Distraction, as per What Exit?
Or even just one:
It’s all part of his ingenious plan. Which will be revealed in two weeks…
Hey Donald!
Remember all those people you stepped on, on your way up?
They remember you, on your way down.
These people are not smart, they are criminals with credentials. Driven by greed and blinded by the fact that they got away with their high crimes for so long that they think that they actually are too big to fail.
Yeah, Weisselberg got a ton of perks working for Trump. He just had to turn his conscience off.
(almost typed “conscious” which is almost as true).
Pissing off people who own a really big media franchise is usually a good way to persuade them to use it against you. Seems trump can’t even play tic-tac-toe.
Greener’s Law: Never argue with a man who buys ink by the barrel.
Well played, Forbes. Well played.
Moderating
To all: No more on the Bagels. It is at least a distraction and verging on a hijack.
I think it’s appropriate to keep the following question here, because it deals specifically with the Trump Org and the NY cases, but if they do smack Weisselberg with perjury charges, especially in light of several other heavy shadings of the truth that have come up to date, is NY going to to be able to pull the consideration he got in his own conviction?
Does side Trump get use this to paint his testimony against Trump as unreliable?
He could try the Louis Renault approach:
If only he had half of the class of Renault.
And I doubt anyone has had a beautiful friendship with him.
Welp, per Wiki Mar a Lardo is 62,500 square feet. So that pencils out as a paltry $230,769 per square foot. I think that’s reasonable, don’t you?
So if I were to put in a bid for the White House for say USD1.5bil, I’d get knocked over in the rush to accept it?