Yeah. I’m looking at some of that Weisselberg/McConney testimony now:
I’m wondering, though: since we established that this is not simply the penalty phase, but also litigates Causes of Action not dispensed with by Summary Judgment (and not currently under appeal) …
Will we see Weisselberg and McConney again in this go-around.
Not this case. It’s in the NY state system, so wouldn’t go to the federally appointed courts. Maybe the Meadows application to have the Georgia case moved to federal court?
I saw a comment on the the article above saying something like:
Republicans keep harping on Biden’s perceived cognitive issues, but they have no problem with a Republican in a courtroom saying over-and-over “I can’t remember. I can’t remember. I can’t remember.”
Ivanka Trump said her family’s vision for the renovation of the Doral golf resort in Florida was shared with Deutsche Bank in the negotiations process for the funding.
“They were quite excited about it,” she said of Deutsche Bank. “They sent teams of people down to tour the property to visit the property and to experience it in advance of our purchase.”
Donald Trump had a “sentimental affection” for the Doral property in Florida, his daughter said. He would tell her stories about going there as a child with his father and later with her mother, Ivana.
I have to admit I am not a lawyer, but I’m a bit confused about how this family tidbit would excuse fraudulent behavior. What was the point? Do they think this will bring a tear to the judge’s eye?
You’re kidding right? During Trump’s testimony he responded to a question about a property’s value by talking about China, Russia and Joe Biden’s poll numbers.
If Ivanka wants to talk about her father’s affection for the golf resort, and her wonderful memories of visiting there as a child…at least that tangent mentions the property.