I think it’s for the same reason that the capital is in Albany: the state’s founders wanted to make sure that New York City didn’t completely dominate New York State.
To the extent of saying the legal process should work its way out and he shouldn’t resign until it does, at least. I don’t see him proclaiming that Adams is innocent and being persecuted, or anything along those lines.
But it is a contrast to others calling for him to resign immediately, so it’s worth remarking on.
There’s a wide variety of opinion on when one (in general) should break the rules when the other side has abandoned them. Ranging from first (do unto others as they would do unto you… but do it first) to “never sink to their level”.
Not doing anything and sticking to the norms can be the moral thing to do, or it can be indecision or worse, cowardice. I think I can guess your opinion, and I admit to leaning that way as well as a pragmatist, rather than an idealist.
“B…b…but we made sure John Fetterman wore a suit on the Senate floor! We were polite and congenial to Bret Kavanaugh! We gave you time to whip enough no votes before we impeached Trump, for crying out loud!”
“That’s nice. What would you like for your last meal?”
That’s where things are going if Democrats don’t grow a backbone.
Reading your link this could only happen once charges are filed. Your link isn’t super clear where the charges would be filed but at this point it appears they would have to be state charges. That could take a minute or two. And it would only last for 30 days.
Next steps would be a Committee of Mayoral Inability empaneled to determine by a 2/3rds vote that the mayor is permanently unable to serve. It looks as if this committee would be composed of the City Council. Again, from your link. The language makes me think this for removal along the lines of the 25th Amendment of the Constitution talks about removal of the POTUS.
I don’t think this process would be as smooth and neat as you assume. There is a lot more to it than Hochul just waving a magic wand.
I think @Smapti is correct. According to Section 9 of the New York City Charter (in Smapti’s link), the governor can simply remove the mayor.
The mayor may be removed from office by the governor upon charges and after service upon him of a copy of the charges and an opportunity to be heard in his defense. Pending the preparation and disposition of charges, the governor may suspend the mayor for a period not exceeding thirty days.
Then comes Section 10, which details how a successor is chosen once a mayor is suspended. It also describes what happens if the city’s “committee on mayoral inability” itself decides the mayor is unable to continue in office. That scenario is different from a suspension/removal initiated by the governor.