The trial that resulted from the occurrence discussed in this thread has concluded and gone to the jury.
Here is what seems to be a fairly unbiased summary of the two sides in the trial. Given this, if you were a juror, how would you vote.
I think I would vote for involuntary manslaugher. It’s pretty clear to me that it he was not intending to shoot this man (given the circumstances that would have been ludicrously stupid) but it was appalling carelessness on his part, so Not Guilty is not an option.
How about you?
Roddy