I’m trying to be unbiased about this, though I look at it the other way from the start. The answer is no, but for different reasons.
First, Lincoln governed the way he did because he was politically weak. He did have broad-based support, but broad-based support is always shallow. He needed his rivals’ strength badly, and he barely kept them under control. Sometimes he didn’t, and the arguments nearly tore the White House apart. Lincoln spent a lot fo hsi time fending off sneak attacks from Salmon P. Chase, mollifying Seward until Seward realized he was outclassed (and came to think of Lincoln as a friend).
Obama did not have to do that, though the ideal might have been behind his appointment of Clinton. That was probably a mistake, however, because Clinton hasn’t been very good at diplomacy and has had some nasty arguments. But he didn’t appoint rivals because he didn’t need them, and he didnt’ have many open rivals. And his other appointments have been hit-and-miss. He’s had some utter loons in high positions. I go back and forth on Biden: the man seems effective at times, and at other times he’s basically a walking font of idiocy. Appointing Turbo Tax Tim was a mistake for several reasons, not the least of which is that he was more valuable at the New York office in 2008.
But mostly, I see one critical difference in administrative style. Obama acts a lot like a University President. He doesn’t really seem to care that much about the administration. He never seems interested in actual administrative work, and has taken an embarassing number of vacations.
I actually would have voted for Hillary for President. I dont’ expect she’d be that much better, but she is tough. Her campaign was a disaster, probably because she didn’t imagine the inexperienced, ineffective junior Senator would build such an organization in that short a time, spurred on by Progressives who didn’t like the Clintons.
In short, no, Obama is nothing like Lincoln. But there’s no reason he should be like Lincoln: he’s very different, younger, less experienced, and came from a very different background, politics, and political environment. If there were any President he reminds me of, it’s Woodrow Wilson.
As far as his style goes… I can say that we definitely don’t think of him as being particularly nonpartisan. Or rather, he’ll talk grandly of all the wonderful things he’ll do and how awesome life coudl be if we just work together, and then follow up with a vicious, ignorant diatribe aimed any anyone who isn’t supporting him now. So no, we don’t think much of his supposed bipartisanship.
We have noticed that now and then he’s just handed us something we wanted. That has not been invisible to us. We don’t particualrly see it as any kindness, because we’re not fighting for arbitrary, meaningless “victories”. We have a purpose and a platform.