Obama Kicks Bush Torturers in the Nuts

Using your own logic, if we don’t set a goal of winning a war to begin with, there won’t be any fighting and there won’t be any war to win.

George W. Bush stated a philosophy of war similar to what you posted when he participated in the first Presidential Debate in 2000:

In another direction, can Congress act on the prosecution of those responsible for the violations of the law(s) against torture?

You, you [string of expletives deleted because of the wonderful Pit policy]. You keep saying ‘well, you say these practices are a horrible affront to the dignity of a human being and a blatant violation of the Constitution, and these guys being paid to justify it say it’s maybe not horrible, so it’s all just opinion and you guys are a bunch of poopyheads for saying it’s bad’. You have repeatedly defended their tortuous reasoning that the United States should torture, mostly because you refuse to believe that the feelings of any other person matter or even exist, because your hero, Ayn Rand, worshiped psychopaths and sociopaths.

Jack, it won’t matter how many times it is done for the response is a hard-wired survival instinct.

If you haven’t done so already, I highly recommend you read our own Scylla’s account of the experience.

Should that not be enough, read this expert’s take:

Master Instructor and Chief of Training at the US Navy Survival, Evasion, Resistance and Escape School (SERE)

More at source…

http://www.politicalaffairs.net/article/articleview/6038/ Japanese soldiers were found guilty of torture after WW2. They specifically were accused of beatings and water boarding. It was torture until we said, it is now not torture but merely enhanced interrogations. it is torture.
The latest story saying a prisoner was waterboarded 183 times in a month is ridiculous. That would be over 60 times a day. that would be impossible. That would be every 8 minutes night and day.

No, it’d be around 6 times a day.

Not that that’s any better or anything, just easily accomplished.

Might want to check your math there, gonzomax.

Your math is doubly bad, dude. Even if it were 60 times in a day, that would be once every 24 minutes, not 8. In any case, it’s about 6 times per day* on average*, which is roughly every four hours on average.

Well, glad we got that cleared up! Now, I am only about 60% as nauseated and heartsick as I might have been.

Not that that makes this any better, of course, just pointing out that gonzomax is often wrong.

Bless his heart, he means well.

If I am wrong, please clarify. I thought you and others defended the state’s legal right to use torture on enemy combatants because it is an effective method to extract information. Should torture be legal for military interrogations?

I think that’s one of the reasons I’ll always have respect for Scylla. (I may not agree with him politically, but damn, he certainly has balls.)

Except that lately he’s become a whiny-ass anti-liberal drive-by-one-liner. And that’s when he’s having a good day.

Which is a damned shame. Scylla’s always been one of my favorite posters-when he’s not talking politics, some of his stories are hilarious. (I always love hearing about his interactions with his kids)

Since it isn’t torture would you be okay with your daughter being water boarded, dipped in a vat of bugs, banged head into wall, or shipped off Syria for beatings?
If you say no then why not? Keep in mind “innocent” doesn’t matter since there have been innocent victims of this torture.

Answer the question. I’ve asked you three times now. You’re being disingenuous.

Trying to remember this, google fu is weak…

Either Kahlid Sheik Muhammed provided the info that fingered Abu Zabeda, or vice versa. At least I recall reading that. Anybody got thier finger on that cite, by chance?

And which one provided the “intel” that connected Saddam with AlQ?

“A wilderness of mirrors” in the words of professional paranoid James Jesus Angleton.

I appreciate the compliment Guinistasia paid me. I resent the mischaracterization you’ve applied to me.

These are my last 750 posts:

http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/search.php?searchid=4256456&pp=25
It’s extremely rare that I make a single post in a thread. If I do, usually it’s MPSIMS or a joke.

I got up to # 125 looking for a “whiny-ass anti-liberal drive-by-one-liner” but didn’t find any.
Here are your last 750 posts:

http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/search.php?searchid=4256501&pp=25
I think I remember dismissing you as a dishonest and immature flaming left-wing nutjob. Now I remember why.

And yes, this will be a drive by. I don’t think you’re interesting or intelligent enough to engage further.

Thanks. If you change your mind I hope you’ll do so based on your own observations of my behavior rather than that lying idiot.

Dishonest? Immature? Nutjob? Strong words. Care to back them up?

In a thread that had nothing to do with a partisan approach to charity.
And this:

is, to put it charitably, creative logic.

TTR’s comment was entirely correct, as many Republican officials, in the mainstream even, approve of the CIA’s conduct over the last several years, which is also the opinion of a majority of self-identified Republicans. You then proceeded to construct a strawman of ridiculous lies and claimed that the two were equivalent.

I will concede that the posts I quoted are not one line long. There is not a significant difference, for the most part.

Well, I wish you wouldn’t be so hasty to judge all liberals the same way. (Don’t turn into a Starving Artist or a Shodan-we don’t need another, please!)

:wink: