Google “Black Panther voter intimidation” and you get results. With a decided preponderance of Washington Times, Fox News, and Michelle Malkin sort of “sources”.
By comparison, a source I trust, Talking Points Memo, has a very different take on the matter at hand, offered here:
By their reckoning, much ado about not much. Since I have yet to be burned by trusting them, I think I shall.
But that’s not quite my point. My point is that this issue, while trivial, is at best controversial, solid fact is not available, we have only interpretations.
But you, without so much as blinking, offer us the most damaging interpretation possible, without so much as hinting that the matter is far from certain. With bland certainty, you offer the most negative possible interpretation of Obama’s actions (or inactions).
The same applies to your assertion that Obama’s Communications Director is a “Mao groupie”, an assertion I find laughable, but you offer as though you had an affidavit from God Almighty, countersigned by Archangel Gabriel.
You offer a puzzlement. You loudly declaim your faithful loyalty, and yet seem eager to believe any slander offered to Obama without so much as a blink. We must not dismiss our opponents “out of hand”, you claim, and that is as may be. But why are you required to swallow any spoonful of horseshit with a big smile and an “Mmmmmm-good!”?
You are watching my back? Perhaps you could watch my back from well in front of me, about twenty yards or so? Because, to be perfectly frank, I don’t trust you.