Zakaria is a funny name? No, his wife’s maiden name was Throckmorton. THAT is a funny name!
It has been bothering me for some time that many morons (not you) on the street say that Barack Hussein Obama is a “funny name” without thinking about how they can at least come close to pronouncing or spelling it right first try, which many people cannot do with good, All-American, Polish names. Zbigniew Brzezinski? :rolleyes:
I’m not sure how I feel about Giuliani as head of FEMA, but I don’t think it is very likely. I think it is more likely that David Paulison, the current head of FEMA and a Democrat, stays on there unless he is moved up to Secretary of Homeland Security.
Alright, I’m drunk, I’ll just say it… Obama could be Mr. Totally Gracious and make John McCain secretary of something that doesn’t involve bombing Iran or drilling ANWR. That would strike me as being extremely classy. Not that Obama needs any bonus classy points, it would just be really cool.
Er - honestly, I’m as big a Katyal fan as anybody, but the man’s not even forty, and he’s got no judicial experience at all. He’d be an interesting nominee for a US District Court - but he’s not ready to rock out with the Supremes just yet.
…He’s got more experience than Miguel Estrada did when he was nominated for the D.C. Circuit. But you’re right, we don’t want to be like them.
Akhil Amar, Seth Waxman, Cass Sunstein, and Sonia Sotomayor, then. Pick any two or three, and that’s not a bad slate.
(I will disagree with you on one thing. If Katyal were to get nominated to the bench, there’s no way he wouldn’t go straight to the circuit level. I’m a former district court clerk, and I’ve got more respect for those judges than almost anyone, but Katyal’s academic and appellate background aren’t suited for the trial court level. And there’ve certainly been circuit judges as young as he would be in a couple of years.)
I have to agree with Sam on this one - nominating someone who’s been big on pushing conspiracy theory and pseudoscience (on the debunked vaccine-autism connection) would be a huge mistake. What we don’t need is another administration that politicizes science.
Obama will have to decide whether pleasing Hillary Clinton and Caroline Kennedy with an RFK Jr. selection outweighs the potential damage to his administration’s credibility.
After reading the New Yorker article, I think Chuck Hagel will be Secretary of State (or maybe Defense). Colin Powell could be vice-versa. Or Gates could stay on at Defense.
The New York Post also mentions RFK Jr. as a potential EPA head - although of course, they said Kerry was picking Dick Gephardt for VP and they’re a dyed-in-the-wool tabloid, so they can be wrong with the best of them. (They picked a great headline, though: “Bamelot.”) Still, I’m shaken by what a shockingly awful choice that would be. After such a long time of Democrats saying they were pro science and the Republicans weren’t, it would be very dispiriting to see the Dems give these paranoid anti-science morons such a, well, shot in the arm.