Of Course, It's Going To Be Florida, ... Again!

I’m hoping that the Democrats in Missouri actually all get to vote this year, & it will outweigh what Jeb’s little cartel pulls.

Then there’s this bizarre little story:
http://www.pbs.org/newshour/vote2004/demconvention/mo_voting.htm

No early voting? Ever hear of <i>absentee ballots???</i>

I haven’t received anything in the mail like this. Which really sucks because I will probably NEED an absentee ballot. But, I’m too lazy to figure out where/how to go get one.

Considering Florida will probably decide this election just like in 2000, and the I-4 Corridor makes up 25% of Florida’s votes, you guys can be happy that Bush will lose a vote because I don’t care enough to get an absentee ballot.

Well, assuming you live in Bay County, you fill in this form. My guess is that the other counties have similar forms to fill out.

foolsguinea, apparently, in Missouri, you need a reason for voting absentee (well, a reason other than “I’d rather mail in my vote” which is all the reason you need in my state). So, no, many people can’t vote early by absentee ballot.

Wow, that was quick, easy and painless. Thank you.

Of course, we only vote for one position in our federal elections - the local Member of Parliament. For example, in the recently concluded election, in my riding, we only had to choose between five candidates for the one seat (Conservative, Liberal, New Democrat, Green, and Christian Heritage).

That’s why the system works well. As others have commented, it likely wouldn’t translate well into a system where you’re electing the President, senator, congresscritter, state reps and municipal reps, let alone plebescite questions.

But that raises another question: why does everything have to be all on the same day in American elections? Why not stagger the elections so that federal elections are on even years, as currently; state elections are always on odd years; and municipal elections could be on a different cycle entirely (e.g. - spring elections for municipal matters)?

That way, for federal elections, you would only have two or three ballots: one for the Prez/Veep choice; one for the local congresscritter; and in two out of three electoral cycles, a senate ballot. Paper and pencil would likely be quite efficient for three separate, simple ballots.

And as for the time needed to count the ballots, well, I’ve never noticed much of a difference between the speed of election returns in Canada and the U.S. In our recent election, the results were pretty clear about an hour after the polls closed in the west.

Here’s a new (and thoroughly revoltin’) development! (I owe this to elucidator’s thread in the BBQ Pit – http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?t=271561). From Bill Herbert’s op-ed column in the New York Times, August 16, 2004 () (if you’re not a subscriber, Der Speigel Online picked up the story – http://www.spiegel.de/politik/ausland/0,1518,313458,00.html):

Sorry, flubbed the NYT link – http://www.nytimes.com/2004/08/16/opinion/16herbert.html?hp

Wow. This is strange.

In the first place, if predominantly black precincts are doing something illegal with the absentee ballots, then I don’t see why the police should hold back an investigation just because of the fears of political repurcussions.

Second, would it be better if these mostly elderly folks were summoned to the police station instead? The cops are probably thnking it’s easier on the workers to interview them at home rather than make them travel downtown. I also doubt they’re busting down people’s doors–if asked to leave or come back later, I’m sure they do. They can’t get in unless the resident lets them in, right?

I also am curious as to how many voters of other ethnicites are involved. Maybe this is a wide-ranging thing where the interviews happen to be mostly-black wards first.

I just don’t know. I respect Bob Herbert a lot but there’s a lot of holes here. I can only imagine the history that goes through peoples’ minds down there but neither do I think elderly or black voters are fragile flowers whom the system dares not scare by asking them questions about a federal crime.

Here’s an update on the Orlando story: http://www.nytimes.com/2004/08/20/opinion/20herbert.html?n=Top%2FOpinion%2FEditorials%20and%20Op-Ed%2FOp-Ed%2FColumnists%2FBob%20Herbert Bob Herbert says the FDLE sent a letter to the state attorney in Orlando May 13, declaring that “It was determined that there was no basis to support the allegations of election fraud concerning these absentee ballots. Since there is no evidence of criminal misconduct involving Mayor Dyer, the Florida Department of Law Enforcement considers this matter closed.” Yet still state troopers are investigating the matter, and visiting the homes of elderly black voters to do so. A spokesman for the FDLE says the May 13 letter was “poorly worded” and meant only “that there was no evidence that it did not appear that Mayor Dyer himself was criminally involved.”

And in another editorial dated today (8/23), Herbert says,

Meanwhile, according to the Orlando Sentinel, six Congressional Democrats are demanding that AG Aschcroft investigate the matter: http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/orl-locvoters20082004aug20,1,5569340.story (You have to register to view the story but registration is free.)

Omitted the link to Herbert’s 8/23 editorial – here it is: http://www.nytimes.com/2004/08/23/opinion/23herbert.html

You answer your own question, Sir.