The problem is that there are black names that are widespread enough that they can’t be said to be “made up”.
Names of African heritage, like Aisha (Swahili), Bakari (Swahili) or Chara (Ethiopian).
Islamic/Arabic names like Jamila, Jamil, or Saleem.
Names of another ethnicity like Tyrone (Greek), Darnell (English), Antoine (French), Marcus (Latin) Leticia (Spanish), or Maia (Greek).
Names that were coined solely by African Americans, either by combining or transforming pre-existing names (like “Demarco”, “Lasondra”, or “Lawanda”) or creating something out of whole cloth (like “Temika” or “Keisha”). They are adopted today because they are seen as being nice-sounding, respectable names…not necessarily because they are unique.
I know people named all the above names. None of them are trashy, poor, or uneducated. Sure, a parent who names their child “La-Shay-Shay” should be horse-whipped, but what about a parent who names their child “Latonya”? Should Ebony, Germaine, and Shondra be ashamed of their names because they may be perceived as being too “black”? Where do we draw the line in bashing “black” names? Do all of them get tarred or is it just some of them?
The woman in the commercial is wrong because black people do not have some monopoly on weird names. That’s like saying “What’s up with white names?” because you’ve run across a few Rainbow’s, Dakota’s, and Solei Moon Fry’s.
IMHO, discriminating against a name because it’s linked to low-classdom is just as wrong as discriminating against a name because it’s black. I don’t know why people don’t understand that.