According to my information, the factory recommended intervals are as follows:
4 cylinder, normal service: 10,000 miles.
4 cylinder, severe service: 5,000 miles.
6 cylinder, normal service: 7,500 miles.
6 cylinder, severe service: 3,750 miles.
Severe service includes driving mainly under one or more of the following conditions:
Driving less than 5 miles (8 km) per trip or in freezing temperatures.*
Driving less than 10 miles (16 km) per trip.*
Driving in hot [over 9O°F (32°C)] conditions.
Extensive idling or long periods of stop-and-go driving.
For many people, this is consistent with typical city driving. Most auto shops in metropolitan areas assume severe service in their oil change interval recommendations. The question is (if my info is correct), why are they saying 3,750 miles instead of 5,000 miles?
My guess would be the dealer is using the 3,750 mile interval because it was the norm (for most Japanese cars) for many years. Since it still applies to some models, they’re probably taking the easy way out and using a “one size fits all” approach rather than dealing with different intervals for different models/engines.
I think you’ll be fine following the manufacturer’s recommendation. They invest a lot in developing and researching these things, and are an authoritative source. Dealers seldom have a sound technical reason to suggest otherwise.**
*These two taken together don’t really make sense. If it said trips of less than 5 miles, and trips of less than 10 miles in (not or in) freezing temperatures, it would make sense.
**Seldom, but I wouldn’t say never. There have been cases where real-life experience shows that the factory recommended interval and/or oil type is not sufficient to protect the engine. I’m not aware of any such situation with Honda, however.