Ok,Im new here,Carol is the name

[Kolga]

Wait, cattle mutes are related to crop circles because of black ops and UFOs, but not aliens?

Yea, this is high level crazy right here.

[Smeghead]

@pravnik

They got his anus.

Never! They can have my anus when they pry it from my cold, dead rectum!

[Colibri]

@Smeghead

Never! They can have my anus when they pry it from my cold, dead rectum!

If your rectum is actually cold and dead, I will send a Turkey Vulture over to take care of the job toot sweet.

[gonzomax]

When I first encountered cow mutilation long ago ,it was interesting. But after 20 years of plucking out eyeballs and anuses, don’t you think aliens would have learned all they can get from them by now?

[Attack_from_the_3rd_dimension]

People still study barnacles.

[Smeghead]

@Attack_from_the_3rd_dimension

People still study barnacles.

Yeah, but they have huge penises.

[Attack_from_the_3rd_dimension]

@Smeghead

Yeah, but they have huge penises.

We wouldn’t have known that if we hadn’t kept studying them.

[Colibri]

@Smeghead

Yeah, but they have huge penises.

How many malacologist’s penises have you seen?:dubious:

[pravnik]

@Colibri

How many malacologist’s penises have you seen?:dubious:

Why, what have you heard?

[Euphonious_Polemic]

@Colibri

How many malacologist’s penises have you seen?:dubious:

Zoology fail.

A malacologist studies animals in the phylum mollusca, such as clams, snails, squid etc. Barnacles are Arthropods, more specifically crustaceans. I don’t think there is a particular name for a scientist who studies crustaceans. (Crustologist? Crustaceanologist? Crustalist?)

ETA: More to the point, what do you call someone who studies the removal of cow anuses (ani?)

[Ostrya]

>jk>We’re questioning the size of your weeder, here. But nice try trying to change the topic. >/jk<

[Autolycus]

@Euphonious_Polemic

ETA: More to the point, what do you call someone who studies the removal of cow anuses (ani?)

Dr. Now, Your-Cookin?

[Ostrya]

took me a sec but that was a pretty good one,Mr. Autolycus wait your not joking are you.

[Koxinga]

wats the differenz between laffing with me and laffing at me?

[Koxinga]

@carol_nistri

Well try looking at it from my point of view,I litterally stumble onto this board,I read a piece by the owner of the board and followed the links here,I took a chance and put my thread in the Great Debates forum,but it was immediatly transferred to the Mundane. Shrugs,Id come this far why not post and see if I get any nibbles.It was clear from the beginning you guys were a tough crowd but I dont easily get discouraged so I decided to see just who thought what about what.It turned out to be a load of fun,you guys are top notch.

Welcome to the board! Sorry about the cow remark earlier.

[Smeghead]

@Colibri

How many malacologist’s penises have you seen?:dubious:

Don’t judge me.

[kayaker]

@carol_nistri

You know as a matter of fact I havent seen a single episode of South Park.

Now that is some fucked up shit.

[carol_nistri]

@Koxinga

Welcome to the board! Sorry about the cow remark earlier.

Not to worry Koxinga,we both have two feet lets start out on the other one.

[carol_nistri]

@The_Hamster_King

No. He’s a ninny. In fact, if you look at comment #4 at that link you can read why I think so.

Hamster King,do you mean paragraph four?

[Marley23]

@carol_nistri

Hamster King,do you mean paragraph four?

He means this comment posted after the end of the article:

@The Hamster King

• #4 • 11:48 on Wed, Apr.28 •
“Now that disclosures about actual beam weapons are available, including devices acting from the sky and beams capable of harming humans and stopping engines, we have to revisit the issue and look a bit more seriously at the hard facts left unexplained by the hoax explanation.”

Except that the “actual beam weapons” don’t do the things you imagine they’re capable of doing. They’re just normal microwaves, not magical bending rays. They can heat things up, and disrupt electrical circuits. If crop circles were composed of areas where the stalks were scorched from top to bottom or vaporized, then you hypothesis might have some merit. But since they consist of stalks that are folded over in a uniform direction, your “beam weapon” explanation makes no sense.