Okay, first time listener. Tell me what's good RE: Pink Floyd albums

Dark Side of the Moon time.

Okay, first of all…what is the POINT of Speak To Me? Is this ever gonna be on anyone’s list of “Top five songs of all time”? It’s pretty much nothing but silence…then a little bit of a drum and laughing. Plus it didn’t even end before the next song (Breathe) started. It was just an intro to Breathe dammit! Don’t give me that “Speak To Me” is its own thing…it’s just a long intro, that’s all. Doesn’t even deserve a review, IMO.
Yeah, I know. I probably just don’t “get it”. But this is why I’m not crazy about music that is like this. I don’t want to have more questions than enjoyment of music. I like bands that make songs that have a beginning and end, that actually has content, that isn’t just random noises or breathing or laughing. So far this is two albums, now, that makes me think Pink Floyd just might not be for me.
Okay…so…Breathe. Slightly better, but still mostly just…groaning. It sounds like the singer is just groaning. In the last half of the song, because the first half is MORE FUCKING INSTRUMENTALS. Hey, I realize not all music has to have words, but the music I tend to like usually does.

It’s like, okay… On the Run. Sorry, but this fucking song is BULL. SHIT. The first two minutes are nothing but this weird “bobbly” type noise you’d expect to hear out of a pinball machine. This isn’t music, this is a waste of my time is what it is.

And that all leads to Time…which is the best song on the album so far–and that’s saying something–because even that one (in my opinion) isn’t overly great. It’s just okay. It’s got a good intro and good sounds and good singing (good Lord, actual SINGING?? WORDS?? In a Pink Floyd song??? What are they doing here?), but it’s brought down in a big way by being ALMOST TWO AND A HALF MINUTES of instrumental. Again, I don’t like “just instrumental”. If someone had told me “Uh, you know that Pink Floyd is mostly an instrumental band?” I might have just skipped listening to this band. But anyway, the singing in Time is good, for what it’s worth.
And I like the guitar stuff. See… I don’t mind instrumentals when they’re paired with singing. You know the song Light My Fire by The Doors, right? That one has one of the BEST MUSIC SOLOS I’ve ever heard, IMO. Almost six or seven FULL MINUTES of nothing but instruments. But see, that song is BOOKENDED by singing (and good, catchy singing) at both ends.
These songs, they’re either all instrumental or they start out that way and don’t reach a good enough peak to make the entire song that good, IMO.

Okay, so…The Great Gig in the Sky. I start listening. No words. I listen more. Just music. More. Instrumental. I look at the album info. Hm, well, it says vocals done by two people in this song, so I assume they’re coming soon. I listen on. Nothing. Wait. Crooning. By a human perhaps, although it sounds almost more like a loon with a leg chopped off. “AHHHHHH! AHHHH! AHHHHHHHHH WAAAAAOOOHAAAAAAAHHHH!” Someone is being tortured. Okay, when the hell is the vocals? I’m waiting. Listening more. More wailing. It’s nails on a chalkboard. Song ends.
What the fuck…?? Those were vocals? Uh, no. Not on any planet I’m from. Not by any dictionary I own. Sorry looks it up Clare Torry, but you suck at vocals. At least on this song. And I had such high hopes when I saw “vocals”, too…but pfft. sigh

Now Money…I remember that one. That one is good. Money is a good song, I have to admit. Money is catchy. It’s rocking. It has a good start, a good beat throughout, good VOCALS…a great guitar solo after awhile. See, THIS is the type of music I like. I like my music like this. Not with screeching and pinball sounds and telling me I have to eat my meat before I get any pudding.

Us and Them is/was another really good song. See, it’s not all bad. It’s not all bitching. I knew/remembered I liked some stuff about this album. That’s now four songs I disliked (Speak To Me, Breathe, On the Run, and The Great Gig in the Sky) and three I liked (Time, Money, and Us and Them)…almost tied. Just about evened out. There may be hope yet. Us and Them DOES suffer from some of that “random mumbling” shit that I’m not a huge fan of, but the nice sax solo makes up for it.

Okay, Any Color You Like. Oops, sorry, I forgot Pink Floyd is British. Any Colour You Like. Which…is instrumental. Ugh. Well, this one seems like it’s the LEAST annoying/bad instrumental of them all, so that’s something. I don’t dislike it as much as the others.

Brain Damage I like, always have…great music and song.
Oh, and by the way, someone mentioned above (eschereal) about how I just gave “Comfortably Numb” one sentence in my last long review…but see, that’s a good thing. It means I mostly liked the song. The shorter the sentence and less I say about a song, the better…because I only tend to go on and ramble and expand when I’m ranting…and I only like ranting about songs I don’t like or think sound stupid or like shit. I’m more likely to bitch an entire paragraph about, say, “The Great Gig in the Sky” and just give “Comfortably Numb” a “It was good”. It means I like it, trust me, no worries.

And finally, there’s Eclipse, which is good. See what I did there, eschereal? I like Eclipse, it’s a good song.

So that’s five songs I didn’t care for and five songs I liked…which I already knew I thought about regarding this album since I’ve heard it before.

Overall, this album just wasn’t as good as The Wall. It was much more “psychedelic-sounding”. I don’t like that kind of music. I don’t like music that is trying to be like colors in my head…and that’s what this stuff sounds like. Lots of instrumentals, random noises, space-agey type of music. Not a huge fan. And again, it was like the whole album was just ONE LONG SONG. Every song lead into the next. I don’t like that with songs. Songs should be enjoyed one at a time, alone, they shouldn’t be dependent on hearing the part right before or after the next one or the one before it. And many could probably argue that they CAN be enjoyed that way…and you’re right,…but listening to it all together on the album, you can’t really help but hear it AS one long song. IMO, that’s slightly annoying.

At this point, I liked Led Zeppelin way more than Pink Floyd. Does Pink Floyd have any albums/songs where they, you know, actually sing normally? Like rock type tunes? Or is it all wavy, spacey, free your mind, trippy, mind wander-y stuff like this album was? It may be a bit of a generational type thing. A few people on here are much older than I (I was born in 1979)…so maybe it was a 70s thing? A “smoke a joint and feel the music and IT SPEAKS TO YOU, MAN…it fuckin speaks to you” type of thing, maybe? I can’t relate.

Anyway, this is all just my two cents. It’s not for everyone, I realize. I’m still gonna keep going, though, in hopes it will get better or that I’ll find something I like… but even if I never do, then at least I can say I listened to it once in my life. Apologies if most of these reviews are gonna sound like one, long bitching session. It may just be that, too, in fact…but like I said,…it’s not ALL bad.

Up next, I think maybe I’ll tackle ANIMALS. I’ve heard very good things about it from a lot of people.

Seriously, give up. Your impressions read like, “This Star Wars thing would be a lot better without all the spaceships”. Animals is going to kill you.

Listen to the song “Wish You Were Here” and leave it at that.

This is 100% true but I’m sort of looking forward to it.

With my Floyd-hatin’ wife it was “Wish You Were Here” where I caught her singing along in the car.

I had to laugh at this, half-expecting someone to come along and try to fix the grammar. :smiley:

From the first two reviews, I suspect PF ain’t gonna be** Idle Thoughts** cuppa tea. Don’t give up just yet though!

“Less artsy, more fartsy!”

I am most definitely not. Post-DSoM Floyd is clearly not the thing for Idle Thoughts, and I find it aggravating to hear it ranked-upon, being a linch-pin of the culture of that period. It is a lot like hearing “your wife is butt-ugly.”

I suggest to Idle Thoughts that he flee the Floyd and seek more appealing pastures, starting with one of my favorite mid-seventies albums, Songs from the Wood by Tull. That is one album with no filler songs. Every part of it works well, it is not spacey at all and it is a good start into appreciating the other greatest band of ever.

Eh, I’ve listened to more than my share of Pink Floyd in my years but I can appreciate that it’s not going to be for everyone without taking it personally.

I’m going to suggest Larks’ Tongues in Aspic by King Crimson, The Lamb Lies Down on Broadway by Genesis and Tales from Topographic Oceans by Yes.

Yes, despite his noble effort, I don’t think Pink Floyd will be Idle Thoughts’ new favorite band.

They don’t do “rock” songs in any normal sense of the word. What they do best is concept albums, where one song leads into the next, where themes are reprised, and where the music sets moods and puts colors in your head (colors sans dope, must be awesome with it). These are all things Idle Thoughts dislikes. :frowning:

I’m not sure what to recommend. The old stuff will be too trippy and even silly. I still would hit Wish You Were Here. Have a Cigar has some rock sensibility and it definitely stands on its own. Welcome to the Machine is also great.

Still, I’m having trouble seeing PF as Idle Thoughts’ band. The line upthread about Star Wars being okay, but would be better without spaceships comes to mind.

I just discovered Animals is 41 minutes long. Pretty short, so I figured I’d do one last one for tonight. Listening to Animals right now. Okay, done. And I’m in the process of listening a second time.

This album, it REALLY surprised me. I liked it a lot. I mean liked a lot. I liked pretty much all of the songs on it. I REALLY loved Pigs on the Wing. It had a folksy sort of sound to it. I liked the strumming guitar opening and whoever sang it has a good voice. Very nice. In fact, if ANYTHING about this song sucks it’s the fact that it’s such a short song…I wish it was longer. Next starting is Dogs, which looks like it’s gonna be one long song at seventeen minutes. Listening to it…wow, I like this one too. It’s nice. Catchy. It’s an excellent blend of vocals and instruments. See, now this one had a long instrumental for most of it, but it was in between singing parts, which made it …well, great sounding. Pigs (three different ones as opposed to flying ones) was also great and fun and very enjoyable to listen to. It was a little repetitive in the middle, but didn’t stay that way throughout…the instrumentals changed up enough not to become too boring or predictable or monotonous. And all through it, interspersed with singing. These songs never forgot about the singing. THESE are good songs, see. This is what I like. Sheep rocked as well. Started out slow but picked up and had great vocals. I enjoyed it so much. And then the ending song, more Pigs on the Wing…such a great song! I didn’t want it to end. It almost had the sound that recent, current music/bands have. Very nice. Almost pop-like.
This whole album was the best one so far…and BY FAR. I mean, it’s almost like a list of the best albums of Pink Floyd, IMO, would look like this:

  1. Animals
    SKIP FIFTY
  2. The Wall
    Skip a MILLION
    1 Million. Dark Side of the Moon

I wonder, did this album come BEFORE or AFTER Dark Side of the Moon? If I had to guess (and I know I could just look it up, but I wanted to go into this whole thing as “blind” as possible), I’d guess it came BEFORE. Before they felt they had to get into all that trippy sounding bullshit that the 70s became known for. It says this album was released in 1977, though…so, pretty far/deep into the 70s, but it’s so much better than Dark Side of the Moon or even The Wall was. I mean, this album was REALLY enjoyable. I liked it a lot. It just sounded much more contemporary. More like a rock album with regular songs should sound like.
Consider Animals my new favorite Pink Floyd Album (topping The Wall).

So…now that I’ve “tasted” a bit of Pink Floyd with three albums, I have to say: I want MORE like Animals and LESS like Dark Side of the Moon and The Wall.

Based on that, what should I listen to next?


This is a crazy post. You couldn’t be more wrong. I LOVED Animals. I mean, it was like listening to a totally different band for me. Animals was NOTHING like The Wall/Dark Side of the Moon. NOTHING. Not even close.

You’re forgetting: I’m a first time listener of these things. You’ve probably heard them all many, many times. Of course they’re probably going to sound the same to you, you can identify Pink Floyd easily, I’m guessing. I can’t.
Animals and The Wall/Dark Side of the Moon are VASTLY DIFFERENT, in my opinion. Extremely so. I really liked Animals. I want more like it. Dark Side of the Moon and The Wall was more like space age, trippy, LSD type music. Animals is more like rock. With songs that have a beginning and end. And words. And without every song going into one another like both The Wall and DSOTM did. And without random noises (well, there were some dogs barking on “Dogs”, but that fit the theme, at least).

Take it from someone who just heard both The Wall AND Animals FOR THE FIRST TIME tonight…they’re like apples and oranges. Truly. Massively different sounds. I wouldn’t call Animals psychedelic-sounding at all, whereas The Wall and DSOTM were extremely psychedelic-sounding (DSOTM most of all–which seemed to me like LSD on a music album). Animals sounded more like just classic rock to me. Good classic rock, too.

I don’t get it. Do some of you really think Animals and the other two sound the same? Because they don’t, trust me. Not sure it’s just because some of you are so used to listening to Pink Floyd that it all sounds the same, but to me, Animals was MUCH, much lighter in tone. It was much easier on the ears. It had more harmonious melodies and music and rock beats. Hell, in a few places on “Sheep” it almost sounded like The Cars singing it (one of my favorite bands). Whoever was singing sounded a lot like Ric Ocasek. It was almost, dare I say, an excellent album. Compare “sounding a bit like Ric Ocasek” to “wavey, spacey, LSD, psychedlic-sounding stuff”. It’s complete opposites.
So, again…keep in mind I’m a first time listener here. More like ANIMALS please. I’m not sure if that means “more of their early stuff” or “more of their later stuff” or “more with this lead singer over that lead singer”, but I hated DSOTM, only SLIGHTLY liked The Wall and LOVED Animals. If you are a TRUE fan of Pink Floyd, that should hopefully be enough to tell me what I’d be more likely to like by them now…

What should be next?

He isn’t going to like any of the albums. At best, he’d sort of like a mix tape of their Classic Rock Station radio hits. Even that would be shaky if he can’t get into “Comfortably Numb”.

[Edit: Welp, guess I was wrong about Animals so what do I know?]

Momentary Lapse of Reason is probably the closest he’ll get to a traditional album structure. No real concept theme and tracks with defined beginnings and endings for the most part, though it still has some instrumental bits and other recorded background parts that won’t work for him.

I agree with the others, if you can’t get into Dark Side of the Moon because there’s a few moments without lyrics, Pink Floyd simply isn’t going to work out for you. Cut your losses and move on to the next project. I hate to see you give up after giving two albums one listen each, but no hard feelings.
The only other thing I can suggest is to do what I do when I want to quickly see what I might know from a band or what I should quickly listen to from a band to see what they’re about. Google “[band name] singles” and Google will hand you a list of their popular songs. If you click on that link you’ll see a pretty good variety of spanning just about their entire career.

But again, I’d sooner you walked away now that hated them more because you continue to force them on yourself.

Perhaps you may want to give Phish a try? Picture of Nectar may be a better fit for you than anything Pink Floyd ever did.

I don’t do requests

To be fair we recommended against Animals (even though most of us love it so much) because it has so much time without lyrics when you very specifically complained about the a minute with out lyrics here on DSOTM here and sound effects on The Wall there and Animals is a whole lot of no lyrics and sound effects.

Anyways, since you liked it so much, Meddle is the next one for you.

I’m listening to Animals again…and I might a third time after this. This is a seriously great album with some great songs.

I liked Comfortably Numb.

It really is, and there’s no reason to rush through these. If you listen to DSTOM, The Wall and Animals all in one day, you may very well think you’ve turned in to a glass of orange juice.

I think most Floyd fans would agree that Animals sounds different. They would disagree with what sounds preferable.

I still would recommend Wish You Were Here, but something inside makes me think you might go for The Final Cut more.

“Sensing a Roger Waters lover in you, I am.”

Anyway, tomorrow I’ll listen to two more and post long reviews. Meddle will be one of them. I haven’t decided on the second yet…but if any album is more like Animals, that should be the one I listen to. : p

Well, that’s good. I think I got the wrong impression from follow-up posts; there’s a lot going on in your impressions.

Anyway, glad that you liked Animals since, as Joey P points out, your previous criticisms would make me bet against an album with long instrumentals and background animal noises. But I’m certainly not going to complain about you liking it.

I’m interested to hear your impressions on Momentary Lapse of Reason, it being a post-Waters effort and perhaps a little more commercial (for lack of a better word) than the previous concept albums of the DSotM/Wall era.

Wish You Were Here is a great album although, given previous comments, I don’t know how you’re going to react to any song that’s “Parts I-V” & “Parts VI-IX”. But, again, was wrong about Animals so who knows.