l should have qualified my observations by saying that I look for the normal electrical interuptions which would include electric lines, large metal structures nearby or changes in landmass (hilly areas).
Again, birds can sense magnetism so we know it is biologically possible.
And it’d only work if the flags were yellow…And I’d stand on one foot, humming the “Star Spangled Banner.”
But seriously, let me try to figure this out. Looking at the link I provided about 10 posts ago, what is the scientific principal of utility locating now?
This was a $7.00 an hour job, folks, we obviously weren’t Science majors.
And solar conditions, and atmospheric conditions, etc. etc. You got a LOT to get through before you can blame anything in the ground for bad radio reception.
Birds don’t get pulled. They use their magnetism as a guide. This is like saying since a compass can point north it can also yank the arm that holds it so that you face north.
You are comparing an ant crawling on you to the equivelant of an elephant stomping you.
That’s absolutely false. The disruption in current caused by an A/C motor (the kind with brushes) is easily detectable using an AM radio. It’s an old trick used by electricians and it works very very well.
Try reading it again. What I’m saying is that an electromagnetic field generated by a power line affects more than just a narrow zone directly above it Why do the rods only twitch when you’re directly over the cable?
Correct, this is why there is “bleeding” and we’d clip to a line, walk out 10’ try to find the signal, then walk it back in. Also why the utility companies give themselves 2’ either side of the marked line. And why it’s such a bitch locating multiple lines in close proximity, or buried in the same trench.
I’m going to have to look up the definition of electromagnetic fields first, before I get into any more trouble.
I also know that any contracter that wandered the streets of Philly with a pair of sticks to find utilities would be hammers by the city on-site supervisor as well as be shunned by the other contractors. After all, would you want to work with the guy whose going to tell his backhoe operator to smash into a gas main because the stickys went bendy-bendy?
[QUOTE=Mr. Miskatonic]
And solar conditions, and atmospheric conditions, etc. etc. You got a LOT to get through before you can blame anything in the ground for bad radio reception.
Weather conditions change, subsurface conditions do not. Which one explains consistent loss of reception at a given site?
Birds are reacting to a sense of magnetism, as would a dowser if that is what is being sensed.
Photons don’t cause the iris to close, it’s a muscular reaction to light. I don’t think anybody is claiming an unseen force is actually pulling a dowsing rod down.
Weather conditions change, subsurface conditions do not. Which one explains consistent loss of reception at a given site?
Birds are reacting to a sense of magnetism, as would a dowser if that is what is being sensed.
Photons don’t cause the iris to close, it’s a muscular reaction to light. I don’t think anybody is claiming an unseen force is actually pulling a dowsing rod down.
Here is a link to a manufacturer of locating devices, how do they work? And are the signals detected by these scientific principles able to be detected with other devices?
There’s no equivelant of the eye for the human muscle system. It takes a lot of light to make the eye react that way, and it takes a lot of electricity to make muscles react. We are not antennas!
That doesn’t make any sense. We are able to perceive very low levels of light and react to it. It doesn’t have to be autonomic for the phenomenon to exist.
We know birds can perceive magnetism.
We know the brain of a bird can perceive subtle queues and react to them.
There is nothing paranormal about humans perceiving magnetism or some other queue that is projected by water. We are exposed to water everyday and if there are perceivable properties that water provides it would be natural for our brains to recognize them on some level and react accordingly.
I have a claim that I am willing to demonstrate. Randi says that it is both a “delusion” and “a fiction not supported at all by geological research.” If Randi is telling the truth, then my claim is regarded by mainstream science as paranormal.
I personally don’t claim it’s paranormal. I say that it’s totally 100% normal. But as you have pointed out that does not disqualify it. According to Randi, it’s paranormal.
JREF asks applicants not to bother explaining how it works, just to prove that it does work. I’m willing to do that. I state that once I prove my claim does work, it will be seen that it isn’t paranormal, but as you say, that doesn’t make a difference. Randi doesn’t care how it works.
Please do write to him and encourage him to honour the challenge he has set.
Because they are pretty sure that they’ll not get it.
My crystal guy is pretty shrewd, but he would get me to read the Randi ‘contract’ as a backup, and I’ve scanned it and smell a rat.
I’m quite interested in the para-mundane, and I happen to know that another borehole is going to be sunk in N Devon about 100 yds from the first. I want to be around when it happens - mostly to see how other people act.
I strongly suspect that there are lurking talents that people don’t want to turn into a circus. For example I am an extremely good interrogator, I used to use it for business, only once have I found a person with the same skills, and she has yelled at me ‘don’t do that’ - it is hard to identify what I was doing, possibly something that I learnt from my uncle … I can only describe it as direct diffidence, but to me it feels like cracking open a nut.
There are strange skills, and a lot of people who would hate to win the lottery.