I have been reading about the “sex essentialist activism” movement within radical feminism in the 1970s, and it’s eye-opening to see just how hostile they were towards not only transgender but intersex women.
I was assuming that there had to be some kind of correctable mistake in the obvious logical inconsistency of complaining when transgender women don’t identify as their birth-assigned gender, and then also complaining when intersex women do identify as their birth-assigned gender. The hypocrisy is indeed blatant, but it isn’t correctable. What it stems from, apparently, is a decades-old denunciation by some radical feminists of so-called “male energy”.
It’s not at all clear what physical entity “male energy” is supposed to be, but supposedly transgender women and intersex women—anybody who can plausibly be described as having any aspect of male biology, at least according to oversimplistic classifications of exactly what biology counts as “male”—all have some of it, so they have to be kept away from cisgender non-intersex women in “women’s spaces”.
Nitpick again, bc I can’t stop being annoying, sorry: “Gender-conforming” typically refers to gender expression, i.e., how people publicly present their bodies and behavior, measured against conventional gender norms and stereotypes about how people of this or that gender are “supposed to” look and behave.
So yes, it is certainly true that the short-haired, flat-chested Khelif is in some respects gender-nonconforming, as are zillions of other women, including many cisgender XX women. She “looks masculine” in some ways, and that qualifies as gender nonconformity.
You’re still right that there’s no actual verified evidence that there is anything in the least atypical about the alignment of her chromosomal or hormonal sex with her birth-assigned gonadal sex and gender identity. But AFAICT there’s no simple term for that.
The “beat up” language is another exasperatingly dishonest rhetorical trick in this anti-trans and anti-liberal propaganda campaign. It’s blatantly trying to evoke the impression of some random violent man criminally assaulting some helpless and terrified female victim.
By contrast, what’s actually going on in each of these Olympic boxing matches is two officially qualified and eligible female-born elite athletes voluntarily and consensually participating in a rigidly regulated and supervised sporting competition. In each case, both the athletes have been competing in the same female categories in other boxing events for a number of years, and I guarantee that each of them knows a lot more actual facts about the other’s physical characteristics and history than any of the fascist goons fuming about “men beating up women” know about either of them.