You are 100% wrong. Like GIGOBuster, you have completely missed the point. Sage Rat is being dishonest too because he is not responding to the point I actually made.
I posted those graphs for one and only one reason, which is to show that the rate of temperature increase in roughly the first half of the 20th century is approximately the same as the rate of temperature increase in roughly the latter half of the 20th century.
Sage Rat and GIGOBuster both responded as if I were showing those graphs for some other reason. Sage Rat because he is dishonest. GIGOBuster because he is stupid (as far as I can tell).
I don’t engage with people who won’t follow my rules of debate. For the most part, this saves me the trouble of responding to habitually dishonest people such as Sage Rat and stupid people such as GIGOBuster.
When not even critics of my grammar are jumping here to defend your “flawless logic”, normal (or I should say humble) minds should begin to wonder if they are wrong.
Your demands that I should be considered an idiot just have no support from anyone that we would consider to be serious.
And since you will only get your wish of banishing me in your site and in your mind, I have to conclude that **brasil84 **is just a sad Nowhere man.
I had already responded (post 82) to your point (post 80) by the time you brought up those two graphs (post 83). Nothing remained to be done except to point out the inherent dishonesty of them.
Pitting me for not responding to your point because you ignored it is rather silly. Like I said earlier in this thread, this is not a vast leap of logic. Your inability to understand really simple ideas that are obvious to even small children–while impressive–makes it rather pointless to try and point anything on any subject out to you, like modifiers in basic English or understanding a recorded history of events in a dialogue, but still one would hope. I truly fear for anyone who has to deal with you on a daily basis.
You are a child.
To all else - could someone please give me a valid reason why anyone would engage brazil84 further? Even posters on his side of the argument are saying his approach to any sort of discourse is unconstructive. Seriously - why would anyone respond to him? He comes across to me as a childish and immature person with zero integrity. What could possibly be gained from trying to follow his made up rules and dealing with his petty little tantrums?