I am not disputing that nothing was taken. So if his intention was to rob the place, he failed. I am only saying it is the most logical reason to trespass inside of someone else’s property, and the most logical conclusion for the witnesses to reach.
I am a white male, 47 years old. Do you know how many times in my life I have left public property and wandered for several minutes into a house under construction on private property? None. Zero. Zip. Nada. You know why? Because I know that I should keep my ass out of other people’s property. I’m not dumb enough to believe that this thread will not be filled with people doubling down on how he was absolutely doing nothing wrong, but he had no damn business whatsoever entering that house and people had every reason to suspect he was up to no good, no matter what his color.
You really are a racist little weasel, aren’t you? The most likely explanation is that Arbery was curious. I’d have been curious. I’ve gone lots of places just to see what there was to see, but I’m white and female so I didn’t have to worry that someone would immediately think I was there to commit a crime.
You, on the other hand, immediately assumed Arbery was there to commit a crime, just like his murderers did. You assumed he did commit a crime, even though there was no actual reason to believe he had. You made, and still make, that assumption that the only reason he would have taken a look at a construction site was because he intended to commit a crime, and the only reason you made that assumption is because he was black.
And let me tell you something you seem to have forgotten: even if he did commit a crime at any level, ***that still does not justify their chasing him down, putting him in fear for his life, and then murdering him. ***
And you can just fuck right off, you white supremacist wannabee a lyncher.
Curious then, the post I was responding to:
This is just nothing but unmitigated astronomically outrageous horse shit - so astronomical that we should name a constellation after you, Herr Garrison. :rolleyes:
It’s not the “most logical.” You have to have intent to show that someone intended to “rob.” You don’t even know the fucking definitions of “rob” or “burglary” and yet you casually throw them out to soft-peddle a defense for murdering someone.
Just do us a favor and go to hell, you disingenuous piece of shit.
I’m a 53 year old white guy and I’ve done this. On a walk around the neighborhood, I’ve gone off the sidewalk to look around new construction. I guess you’re just a naturally incurious racist asshole.
I was just using the term Czarcasm had repeatedly used. Go ahead–look back over the thread, see who introduced the term.
So you aren’t wrong about it being burglary, but you are wrong about it being robbery?
Have you long been a supporter of race-based vigilantism?
Eat dogshit, you pathetic waste of skin. Peddle your asshole defense of racist murderers somewhere else.
You deserve every bad thing that is going to happen to you in the rest of your miserable existence.
Nice try, you stupid festering, smelly shit pile of ignorance.
Nobody made them do anything. They could have pursued in a truck from a safe distance and nobody would have gotten hurt. You’re revealing your backwoods shit-ass character here.
How the fuck is he going to rob someone when “someone” isn’t even on the fucking premises?
That shows him examining the construction site for about 3 minutes. He then resumed jogging.
Are you wrong about your “robbery” accusation, or not?
Okay, maybe “rob” isn’t the technically correct term, either. So whatever is the right term for “taking something that does not belong to you” is when it pertains to an unlocked, unoccupied building, that is what I would assume anyone trespassing on private property to be wanting to do.
Smoke and bullshit. The fucking “term” has nothing to do with it. You introduced the fucking concept that Ahmaud Arbery probably intended to commit some form of theft by spending three minutes in an open construction site.
Regardless of which legal term you misidentified as Arbery’s intended crime, you’re the one who suggested that was the most likely motivation for looking at a house under construction, thereby supposedly providing justification for the fear and suspicion in his armed pursuers.
“Racist asshole” is the only term going through my mind right now.
So now you’re defending lynching people for what you think they want to do.
That’s pretty typical for lynching-defending pieces of dogshit.
“he looked at me funny”
“I think he was wanting the white wimmens”
These have been excuses for lynchings in the past, and the current asshole festering sore is simply repeating the same bullshit from years gone past.
“He was walking suspiciously. So I shot him”
I wonder what Herr Garrison’s favorite confederate memorial statue is?
My life has been rather tame, but I wandered into construction sites when I was a kid. I wish I’d done more of it — I might have learned enough to catch more of the incompetence on view later when my own house was constructed. Tame as my live has been I’ve done other slightly “suspicious” things. At age 50 I was slightly surprised when a security guard followed me into a small empty garden next to a restaurant/bar and asked me to return to the bar. I’ve been accosted several times by police, when guiltless. Several times I might have been persecuted had I acted as a did, were I black in a redneck state.
@ Darren Garrison — Am I correct that in all 47 years you’ve never done anything that a suspicious person might see as having possibly criminal intent? If so, your life may have been even tamer than mine. Congratulations or Condolences, whichever is in order.
I was kicked out of the United Nations building. The UN’s security has a lot more to protect than Prymaat and Beldar do, but no one tried to shoot me.