I’m a mathematician, and I haven’t heard of this. One billion billions already has a name: One quintillion. It’s possible a group of people have given the number this name in a light hearted manner, but I’d have to say it’s nothing more than that, and far from any sort of conventional designation.
In any case Sagan didn’t say a billion billion or a billiob of billions. He said billions and billions. This would, you’d think, refer to number that was quite a bit smaller.
If he never said it, where did this meme come from? “Billions and billions” seems like a rather unremarkable phrase to enter the “memosphere” the way it has. Don’t lots of people say that when describing innumerable things like stars? Why do we associate it with Sagan if he never said it?
Thanks, Cabbage! I don’t always read the links, but I usually try to look at them before asking a question in a thread. This time, obviously, I didn’t.
Oddly enough, I knew this came from Johnny, but in my mind, it was from Sagan actually appearing on The Tonight Show and going on about “billions and billions” of stars.
In the U.S., a billion is 10[sup]9[/sup], and a billion billion (10[sup]18[/sup]) is called one quintillion.
In the U.K., a billion is 10[sup]12[/sup]. A British billion of British billions would be 10[sup]24[/sup], which the Brits would call one quadrillion and the Americans would call one septillion.
Just one reason engineers use exponential notation instead of number names most of the time.
[hijack]
I just saw the movie The Core on HBO the other day and thought that Stanley Tucci’s character seemed to be modeled on Carl Sagan. Was I the only one to think that, or did others notice this as well?
[/hijack]
Sagan did say “billions” a LOT, with a freaky accent that dragged out the “LL” sound in a funny and memorable way. It’s not so hard to stretch it out until “BILLLLYUHNNS” becomes “BILLLLYUHNNS AND BILLLLYUHNNS” in the public consciousness – I swear I remember him saying it, despite all evidence to the contrary. Or maybe it was on a Saturday Night Live parody.
Sagan wrote a book with “Billions and Billions” in the title in 1998:
The question is who said it first: Sagan of some humorist making fun of him? The answer is the latter. “Billions and billions” could refer to the net worth of Bill Gates, as that is multiple billions of dollars. And I assure you, many people have copies of “Cosmos”, and would have pointed out exactly where Sagan uttered that if he did.
I always thought this was kind of dopey on the part of the British. When I think of the -illions, I think of “million” to be “mono”, or one, and “billion” to be “bi”, or two. I can’t fathom how a billion could be interpreted to be a million million, which in effect is saying that two (bi-) is “one squared”. Just doesn’t make sense in any way to me.
Speaking of which, I used to know my -illions up to nonillion, but I’m a bit hazy in the middle. Could somebody help me out?
Million
Billion
Trillion
Quadrillion
Pentillion???
Sextillion???
Septillion???
Octillion
Nonillion
But saying that a billion is a thousand million makes sense? What’s that got to do with “one” and “two”?
And the dopey system is the one used by not only the british, but the rest of Europe, including the French who originated the terms “billion” and “trillion”. (And million, but that was quite a bit further back.)
“Original” system: million = 10^6, billion 10^26, trillion 10^36