One little thing you wish you could change in a movie

I’d fix the annoyingly bad special effects in some movies. The Hunt for Red October was a nicely-made thriller, but the early CGI looks incredibly bad. That’s not ,me speaking from the point of view of someone who has seen CGI become better through the years – the CGI looked pretty awful even at the time, judged by then-contemporary standards. The Mad magazine satire pointed this out, showing Tom and Jerry riding a torpedo at one point.

So fix up the damned depth charges that look like cartoons, and other effects. And, while you’re at it, stop the silhouettes of Sean Connery and Alec Baldwin from bleeding through when the sub is surface cruising up the river in Maine at the end.

I love Forbidden Planet, and wouldn’t touch most of the effects, which pretty much hold up, eve n after all these years. But the shots of the Krel underground machine (not the air shafts – those still look great) stioll look too damned cartoony. Fix it, and the film will be the better for it.

We have at least one still from it, and I don’t know if we have more, but if you could use that to restore the POV shot of King Kong’s body falling from the Empire State Building in the 1933 original, it’d be very dramatic. In the original film, the background kept bleeding through, so all they have is the rag doll silhouette shot of his fall. But the 2005 Peter Jackson film, probably as an homage, contained a shot of Kong falling, in slow motion, seen from above. And it works beautifully.

It’s too much to ask, since it’s such a large portion of the film, but the CGI in The Last Starfighter looks too cartoony – ALL of it. I’ve seen individual screen renders, which show what they really intended, and they look almost photorealistic, like modern-day CGI. I think they must have skimped in the interests of saving time an money, but the spaceships all cam out looking awful. I know some people like this, because it makes the scenes look like they’re from a computer game, but that clearly wasn’t intentional. Fix the scenes.

In Stand By Me, I wish Gordie’s campfire story wasn’t about a fat kid who makes everybody barf at a pie eating contest. I understand that they are 12 year olds, but gross humor has never been my thing, and I could do without a scene of projectile puking.

That’s straight from the novella, though. It’s one of two short stories by Gordon included in the original work by King.

And it’s a good reminder of how these are not young adults on their way to see a body, but little kids.

.

Maybe “Do you have any idea how expensive an M-Class Starfreighter is?”

Also speaking of James Bond films, the continuity error in Diamonds Are Forever with the car entering the narrow alley balanced on one set of wheels and emerging on the other set. I know they tried to laugh it off by see-sawing the shot while it’s in the alley, but it’s still dumb as hell.

“This cargo represents X% of the company’s revenue for the year!”

To be clear, my little change for this movie has nothing to do with the internal structure of the movie’s plot, nor my ability to understand it. It is because of a feeling I have about the movie. That’s all.

Maybe Marvin didn’t expect Jules and Vincent to kill everyone in the apartment? He looked like he was in way over his head.

In One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest, Randle Patrick McMurphy was a burly Irish ginger – as good as Jack Nicholson was in it, he did not even slightly resemble the character Kesey wrote. I am not sure who they could have used.

One thing that always annoyed me was the lame-ass death of Spock in Wrath of Khan. I always felt it should have been a pointless waste. He was always taking “calculated risks”: it should have been a risk that went wrong somehow.

But that would have missed the whole point of the callback to the Kobayashi Maru and the idea that some situations are unwinnable. It’s a major theme of the movie.

There is a deleted scene showing the garrison was done with the assignment and lack of supplies and to a man decided to desert.

Oh, no. Andie is fragile and has to be wooed. Julia is too harsh.

When I read it years ago I pictured a muscular Richie Cunningham so maybe Ron Howard could have done it in the 70’s if he had put on 50 lbs of muscle. In the book McMurphy wasn’t nearly so skeevy, when Jack Nicholson talks about having sex with a minor in the beginning you get the feeling this guy needs to be locked up rather than a drifter that society doesn’t know what to do with.

I am not sure the narrative device with Chief would work in a film. It’s a shame because his role was only a tiny fraction of what it was in the book and his perspective is necessary to understand the place before McMurphy got there and after.

I wish they could have got Fay Wray to say “was beauty tamed the beast” in the Peter Jackson version of King Kong. They (PJ etc.) wanted too, but Fay Wray died before it could happen.

Brian

But he didnt destroy any.

I dont doubt that the Witch King couldnt beat Gandalf. But nor could gandalf destroy the Witch King. It took a hobbit with a rune sword and a determined woman.

It helps to have seen the movie, of course, which I strongly recommend. Fifty-Seven years later, it hasn’t aged a day.

The “studio’s ending” is a jarring cop out, heavy-handed metaphor. The original ending flows naturally from the rest of the storyline.

SPOILER ALERT

(From IMDB) The studio and the producer didn’t like the original filmed ending, so they used a scene of an explosion from the Peter Sellers film The Party instead.
The original filmed ending, supposedly suggested by Lee Marvin himself, in which the two main characters, still arguing, simply go their separate ways, is available on the DVD.

I have, but more like 57 years ago. :crazy_face:

I wouldn’t call it a waste of time, but the book was far, far better.

That’s pretty much how the Andrew Lloyd Webber stage version ends.

My entry: two lines in the movie Million Dollar Baby that, IMO, would have made the movie much better had they been left out - they appear when Maggie is talking to her mother after the title fight:
“I won, didn’t I?”
“They’re saying that you lost”
The “winner” of the fight was irrelevant…and why do I have the feeling that, when it was written, those lines weren’t there, but somebody in some test audience commented, “If the champion got disqualified for a punch between rounds, where’s Maggie’s title belt?”

How does a camera pan in a stage play?