Michael Moore made a very incisive point in Bowling for Columbine. Canadians have guns all over the place (relatively speaking). They aren’t at all an anti-gun society. And yet they don’t have these mass killing incidents at anywhere near the rates that we do in the US. (I have not challenged his statistics, nor looked at whether or not that has changed, so I admit to coasting here).
What causes gun violence in America in ways that it doesn’t occur elsewhere?
Nowhere else is the rate like it is here.
It isn’t just the availability of guns (see the Canada thing).
Are we uniquely a combo of vast oceans of lightly inhabited land where guns make sense and dense urban zones where they don’t? (Canada has some urban zones but not to the extent that the US does, I think? And there have been mass shooting events in Canadian urban environments. Ecole Polytechnique.)
Cultural stuff? Do we have more of a cultural push towards asserting yourself no matter what that mixes with the gun availability and the notion of a person with a gun making it all happen?
Why male? Assertive women arm themselves, sometimes as a response to male violence or the threat of same. They don’t seem inclined to wipe out plural numbers of people in a shooting event.
Masculinity? It’s elsewhere too. Lots of chest thumping and bellligerence and seeking out fights and stuff. Other locales don’t have our phenomenon of way high rates of mass shooting events.
It itself, the Mass Kill Spree Event, as an element of specifically American culture? A notion that’s out there, something to perhaps aspire to, in a way that doesn’t permeate other comparable societies? Can’t make your name otherwise but go down in history if you do this? I can’t dismiss this, although I’m dubious that this is why.
I myself don’t know. I don’t have a theory. I find it bewildering.