I was amazed at the technological incompetence shown in this story:
Politics aside, this was just a terrible way to implement a program, let alone one as critical as Orca. There are dozens of stupid decisions, like lack of training, not letting users test before the implementation, screwing up passwords, and not even doing a simple redirect for people who enter “http” instead of “https.”
(I think you should ask for a thread title change to something a little more descriptive.)
Very interesting and somewhat hilarious article. It’s also worth reading the link contained in the article that’s straight from a Romney-volunteer’s POV. (The picture of the poll-watchers’ checklist including the “bring a chair” twice, yet neglecting to mention “bring credentials” made me LOL!)
I find it amusing how Mitt always boasted about how, since he was a businessman, he was more qualified to run the country. Meanwhile, he apparently wasn’t even qualified to run his own campaign.
So where’s the problem? The makers of the app created a product, made gobs of money off of it, and screwed the consumer. Isn’t that pretty much the way Bain works?
It looks like the software was perfectly able to do what it was designed to do. It was the implementation that was a clusterfuck. I’ve had to implement software, and if it had been done so poorly, I’d be out of a job.
What sort of web designer forgets to direct “http” to “https” automatically? Why wasn’t there a test server for users to try several weeks before the election? Why didn’t they tell their ISP to expect heavy usage?
This isn’t a political failure; it’s incompetent IT management. I suspect the people at the campaign didn’t listen to IT (a common issue in many organizations).
One interesting point from the Time article on the Obama campaign - they began working on their database 18 months ago. That’s a tremendous advantage for an incumbent seeking re-election, over the guy who’s fighting for the nomination until six months before election day.
Note that while there is a some anecdotal stuff about Orca being bad, there are also stories out there that said it “mostly” worked. Not great, but good enough.
There is a lot of spin going on about why Romney lost. A lot. Demographics, tech, money (which is a really hilarious claim), bad polling, etc. But it is all spin. It was about issues. People are in serious denial about this. If you have mainstream stances on issues, then demographics don’t matter.
This “blame Orca” stuff is just a distraction. Forget about it.
Romney’s been running for President just as long as Obama has. I refer, of course, to 2007, when both men began seeking the nomination for their party’s candidacy. Seriously, Romney’s had plenty of time to figure this out. I’ve got no sympathy for him on those grounds.
Plus this would have been helpful to him in the primaries. It’s not like he couldn’t afford it - except that he learned his lesson from Bain to never use his own money.
I think the main problem with the App was a lack of testing. I have heard* that the software developers were at the point of Beta testing ORCA six weeks ago, when they received a frantic message from Paul Ryan who denounced testing as being dangerously close to Science and hence Atheism.
[sub]*the voices in my head were pretty convincing at any rate[/sub]
As someone pointed out in the comments section of some other article I read, this would have been the perfect time to use cloud-based servers, as they can expand and contract bandwidth as it’s needed. That way you don’t have to make sure your server software scales. It’s perfect for a short term burst in activity, which is what they clearly should have been expecting.
Because it couldn’t scale, ORCA actually shut down. Plus, let’s not forget that people who were supposed to use ORCA didn’t get their badges they needed to get in, (as the documentation had a mistake that didn’t tell them they needed one) and didn’t get in. Imagine if ORCA was running at full capacity.