Organ Donation Question: If Parents Can Donate, But Simply Won't

Mr. and Mrs. A are healthy adults with good jobs and good health insurance. They are also from a culture that values males much more than females. Their minor daughter (age doesn’t matter; say 13 because why not), B, needs a kidney transplant. Mom and Dad could both be donors, but both steadfastly refuse because fuck B, she’s a girl.

In the US, could a court force either parent to donate a kidney, on pain of a jail sentence, or the girl being put into foster care, or whatever? Or is she just out of luck?

Story that inspired this question (although the specifics are quite different).

We can’t even compel people to donate organs after they die. No court in the US will compel people to donate organs before they die.

I don’t see how any court can force an individual to go through an operation that they haven’t agreed to.

Such a story. The courts cannot even force a person to be tested to see if they are a possible donor.

At least in the US, the results of the test are secret. My sisters and I were all tested for a match when my mother needed a kidney. I got the result and it was up to me to inform her whether I was a match or not. Only once I had told both her and the hospital that I was a match was the process of setting up the transplant begun. If I had said I was not a match, or even if i had refused the test, no one would have known.

Well yes- it’s only half a joke that the results of a DNA test may reveal the person is not related to their supposed father, for example. There is some reluctance for the medical community to insert themselves in to “pedigree error” reveals.

Can a parent force a minor child to be tested for compatibility? I imagine an interesting court case possibly involving CFS would result if the parents tried to get a minor to donate a kidney or half a liver.

(The flip side of the OP’s question would be “well of course our young daughter should donate a kidney to daddy/brother…” )

Or, you could conceive another child that will become a donor to one of your existing kids.

This story is almost 30 years old, but it mentions 40 babies that have been conceived to become a donor for a relative. I have no idea if this happens today.

Even if it was possible to force a parent to do this, no doctor would be willing to do the operation as every operation has potential complications including death of the donor.

Just fleshing out the specifics from your link to emphasize how different they are:

But yeah, your overall premise does have some basis in attitudes toward women in very patriarchal cultures:

Here’s a2013 update on the Ayala sisters.

Yes, it still does (I’ve seen a case mentioned in Spanish newspapers in recent months). It’s not terribly common mainly because depending on what’s needed, there simply isn’t enough time for the donor baby to get big enough; marrow seems to be a good candidate for “ok, let’s make another kid and cross every digit!”

IIRC that was also the concept in Jodi Picoult’s novel My Sister’s Keeper, and movie made from the book.

I guess bone marrow isn’t quite so invasive and risky and permanent as giving away one of your kidneys or half your liver.