I’m assuming you’ll think following the money will lead to the GOP.
That, notwithstanding the fact that it (if your assumption is correct, did) work, would be a really harebrained scheme. There are always unelectable cranks on the ballot. Why would an opposition party pay to add another when you can get them for free?
Also, how would funding someone unelectable result in him winning the primary?
This line of thought just doesn’t make sense when looking at it from before-the-fact.
And WTF does this interesting tidbit have to do with the fact that he was collecting unemployment benefits and that this is where some of his money came from? Not hypothetical unemployment benefits, actual ones, as detailed by South Carolina’s investigation of the matter.
That is what gets me as well. If you are unemployed, but you have a $10k nest egg that is all you have in the whole world, but you want to be a U.S. Senator bad enough to pay the filing fee, why not campaign at least a little?
He probably wasn’t thinking rationally about his chances or what it takes. Maybe he thought he had such a compelling story the press would come to him.
Think of people you knew in high school who had high aspirations but either had no drive or had no sense of what it took and did no real work towards the goal. That’s what this reminds me of, except for some reason it worked (at least through the primary).