While they may not be humans, they are still often regarded as being part of the family.
The sad reality of dogs and cats is that they are bred so often (either uncontrolled as in the street/homeless ones) or in controlled environment (home owners, as a business, or just for fun and pleasure of having puppies/kittens).
We have so many of them that the number of abandoned, discarded, thrown out dogs and cats is saddening. Animals shelters are overrun and we have too many poor dogs and cats that need loving homes but people keep breeding new ones.
My question is, should there be some sort of rule or law that makes it mandatory for pet owners to be 100% fully responsible for the life of the dog/cat meaning, you are not allowed to discard them, abandon them, else face severe penalty (financial or other)?
It’s a tough one because I understand sometimes situations change and the owner or family is under financial stress and they can no longer keep the pet. Maybe if there is a way to prove that, then they can be exempt. But people who just want to get rid of it because it’s no longer convenient for them or they are just “tired” of having the pet should be held responsible for the life of that pet as if it’s your child. Nobody is allowed to just throw away their children and get away with it.
Should such a thing exist for dogs/cat owners? It makes me really sad to know that many people just adore them when they are young and then become too inconvenient and a nuisance when they get older and no longer have the same appeal. They do this over and over like they are leasing a new car every 2 years to get the newest models.
Well that is easily solvable. Everyone time you purchase a pet, it should be licensed or directly listed under your identification.
Chipping is very easy to do. Every pet could be chipped or tagged so if you do dump the animal one day, they’ll still know whose it is and you won’t be
able to get away with it.
Of course, this will always lead to other problems then. Humans will figure out more devious ways of ending their ties with their chipped pet. They’ll try to find a
way perhaps to put it down themselves from some sort of health ailment or illness as the excuse.
Sure they are; children are given up for adoption or taken into foster care all the time. Lots of people who become parents do more harm than good to their children and it’s a good thing there are options and they are not forced to continue the bad influence.
This assumes that very pet thrown out immediately has the pet police come rescue it and track down the culprit; this doesn’t happen. And of those who could be questioned can easily make excuses: “the just dog ran away 2 weeks ago and I was devastated… now I’ve moved to an apartment and can’t take him back”
This already happens, it’s not something that will happen when 100% chipping becomes a reality. For those with a thick skin it only takes about 60 seconds to euthanize a cat or dog at home with stuff they already have lying around. Better that there are animal shelters as an option I’d say.
There are approx. 126 million households in the U.S.
Approx. 60% of those households (76 million) have pets.
Over 60% of the pet owning households have more than 1 pet.
There are approx. 90 million dogs and 94 million cats as pets in the US.
Approx. 45% of these cats and dogs were acquired through rescue from shelters.
So far so good. A lot of dogs and cats adopted and brought into peoples homes in the US. This is a big reason why the pet supply industry in the US is greater than $20 billion annually.
Now what about the abandonment statistics? Every year about 8 million pets are abandoned. Slightly more dogs than cats. That’s about 4% of the population of cats and dogs in the US. But remember a large number of the dogs and cats get rehomed through adoptions at shelters.
So I would argue that the problem, while is a problem, is not as great as the OP makes it out to be. Definitely not requirement of the types of legal actions the OP is proposing.
In the more responsible areas of the country like New England for example, shelters actually import animals from the less responsible areas (like the South) just to keep up the supply.
States with shelters that export dogs (cats seldom get transferred)
Alabama
Arkansas
California
Florida
Georgia
Kentucky
Louisiana
Mississippi
New Mexico
North Carolina
Oklahoma
South Carolina
Tennessee
Texas
States that receive shelter dogs
Connecticut
Kansas
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
North Dakota
Rhode Island
South Dakota
West Virginia
Wyoming
This is because there is higher demand for adoption in these states.
Even if you mandate chipping, what about all of the feral animals out there already? Catch and euthanize them all? That is going to be ugly and pretty much impossible and I can’t see that ever going down. We can’t even succeed in eradicating invasive pest animals that we almost universally don’t want, like rats and nutria and snakehead fish and feral pigs.
Leaving an animal at a shelter does not count as abandonment.
Animals who are abandoned very often never make it to a shelter. A few of them manage to show up on the right doorstep and get taken in. Most of them will starve, die of illness or injury, or get eaten; they’re unlikely to know how to fend for themselves, and any good hunting territory for ferals is almost certainly already taken.
It’s already illegal and has been for quite some time, at least in many places; and it certainly ought to be.
If it’s true, good for the US. Now try pulling up the stats globally. It is still a big issue. I personally think on average, the US have some of the most loyal and caring pet owners in the world. They really love their pets and want to rescue them. It’s just too bad it’s not like that in the rest of the world where cats and dogs are HEAVILY neglected, abandoned, and people get rid of them all the time when it’s convenient for them to do so and then just buy another puppy or kitten cuz it’s cute and repeat this process while never actually being responsible owners and seeing them through for their entire lives.
Again, this wasn’t meant specifically towards Americans. Like I said, personally, I think Americans are the most loyal and caring pet owners on the planet per capita.
But puppy mills are a real thing, I don’t believe there is a “shortage” of cats/dogs to adopt. If there is, it’s probably because you’re not reading the statistic carefully.
The key point being nearly half the animals in shelters being euthanized. That’s why there’s always a shortage or need for more dogs/cats. You put down the ones you don’t
want anymore and then breed more pups and kits to meet the demand. It’s not because there aren’t a lot of abandons…it’s that half of them end up euthanized.
Well yes you have the people who decide on a whim to get a pet then realize they cant take care of it for the next 10-15 years. Actually for some lizards its more like 50 years.
But I think most people do the best they can but sometimes one must get rid of an animal. About 6 years ago we made the mistake of adopting a husky who started biting the kids and turned dangerous no matter what we tried so we had to adopt him away.
If it were up to me, I’d make people pass a test in order to qualify to own a pet, and to make some kind of financial commitment to care for it (bit like putting down a deposit on a rental).
Mind you, I’d do the same for people who want children.
We have mandatory microchipping of dogs in the UK. Of course, the sort of people who mistreat animals aren’t the sort who generally follow these rules.
Rather than apply a test to potential pet owners, I’d require producers of movies and TV shows with “cute” animals to submit impact statements* before their films inspire thousands of people to adopt animals that can be challenging to raise, only to later abandon them.
Examples: Dalmatians and huskies (which experienced a surge of popularity thanks to Game of Thrones).
Again, unless by “adopt him away” you mean “drove him a long way off and then shoved him out of the car and left him there”, that isn’t abandonment. Re-homing is not abandonment. Taking the animal to a shelter isn’t abandonment (unless you left them on the grounds of a shelter without first making sure they’d be able to accept the animal.) Taking a dog that’s started attacking humans to the vet. and having it euthanized isn’t abandonment. And those things aren’t going to show up in any remotely reasonable abandonment statistics; or to be forbidden by any remotely reasonable law on the subject, or by any existing law that I know of on the subject.
ETA: Omar Little: which specific statistics? and are they counting animals left with the consent of the shelter, or do they mean ones dumped on the doorstep in the middle of the night?
Adopting him away or rehoming is OK. I’m mainly talking about people who neglect to care for the animal they agreed to buy and care for. So I’m mainly talking about people who just throw them away outside, abandon, that sort of thing. Changing minds and then finding a new home for them is ok…you still took care of them and found them a new home to be cared for.