Considering the quality of your content when it comes to supposed bias in the media in this thread(and others), you might want to consider this.
We already told you. You just don’t believe us.
My previously-mentioned definition of “intellectually honest” is looking pretty accurate now.
And what we said was that voting preferences don’t matter. You keep conflating “voting preferences” and “bias”, which the rest of us think are different things. Your characterization of other people’s argument as “biases don’t matter” when no one has in fact said that is therefore looking pretty “intellectually dishonest” by any definition.
Time for you to pick up a new term. Intellectually Lazy.
Suggesting that a show is biased because you think the host votes a certain way is intellectually lazy. Identifying where the host steered the debate in a biased way takes work, and thought, and requires you to defend your belief, not lazy.
Watching Fox News makes you stupider. (Actual study.)
I understand when your brain is so underpowered, your other organs have to pitch in like that, but the rest of us don’t share your handicap.
Dulcolax might help. (Avoid senna, it’s harsh on the colon.)
An opinion based on facts is relevant. An opinion based on shit that’s made up is stupid.
Obviously the people who aren’t making shit up are more honest. Only an imbecile or a liar would conclude that making things up is more valuable than citing actual facts.
I guess perhaps the gut feelings are the problem here. I tend to focus on my brain feelings.
Well, yeah, unless you’re just asking questions! Or if you’re a conservative gadfly who mocks the pretension and hypocrisies of the left. Then you’re totally cool!
Whenever I see “Are you just asking questions?” I immediately anticipate that the person asking questions will respond with “Am I a complete fucking moron”?